The Emotional Dimension of the State Sovereignty in the Context of Ensuring National Security
Research Article
-
Vakhtang Shotovich Surguladze
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
bafing@mail.ru
Elibrary Author_id 783080How to CiteSurguladze V.S. The Emotional Dimension of the State Sovereignty in the Context of Ensuring National Security. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2023. Vol. 31. No. 4. P. 108-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9698
Abstract
The article concludes that the interpretations of the content and dimensions of sovereign state policy existing in modern scientific research and political and legal documents, the latest data in the field of studying political and cognitive psychology, as well as neuropolitics indicate the prospects of studying the mechanisms of ensuring national security and protecting national interests in the field of emotional sovereignty. The importance of providing a link between formal knowledge of the history, traditions, culture of the society and the state and a living, emotional perception is due to the fact that emotional perception of reality serves as an important incentive for the active implementation and protection of values in practice, the formation of sincere patriotism and a nationally oriented elite.Keywords:dimensions of state sovereignty, national sovereignty, value sovereignty, national sovereignty, national security, national interests, ideological and political education, patriotic education, nationalization of elite, identity politicsReferences
Dzhervis R. 2022. Vospriyatie i nevernoe vospriyatie v mezhdunarodnoi politike. M.: Tsentr analiza strategii i tekhnologii. 648 s. (RUS.)
Lal D. 2010. Pokhvala imperii: Globalizatsiya i poryadok. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo. 364 s. (RUS.)
Stiglits Dzh.Yu. 2016. Velikoe razdelenie: neravenstvo v obshchestve, ili Chto delat' ostavshimsya 99% naseleniya? M.: Eksmo. 475 s. (RUS.)
Surguladze V.Sh. 2022. Politika identichnosti v realiyakh obespecheniya natsional'noi bezopasnosti. Trekhchastnaya model' gosudarstvennoi politiki: tsennostnyi suverenitet, opornye tochki identichnosti, deyatel'nostnaya kontseptsiya natsii. M.: Analiticheskaya gruppa «S.T.K.». 960 s. (RUS.)
Surguladze V.Sh. 2023. Aktualiziruya Roberta Dzhervisa. – SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul'tura. № 2. S. 83-100. (RUS.)
Teshke B. 2011. Mif 1648 goda: klass, geopolitika i sozdanie sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. M.: ID GU–VShE. 416 s. (RUS.)
Fukuyama F. 2017. Ugasanie gosudarstvennogo poryadka. M.: AST. 704 s. (RUS.)
Anghie A. 2004. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. xix + 359 p.
Beaulac S. 2004. The Power of Language in the Making of International Law: The Word Sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the Myth of Westphalia. Leiden–Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. xiv + 200 p.
Breau S. 2016. The Responsibility to Protect in International Law. An Emerging Paradigm Shift. N.Y.: Routledge. xviii + 306 p.
Choices, Values, and Frames. 10th ed. (ed. by D. Kahneman, A.Tversky). 2009. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press. 860 p.
Crane A., Matten D., Moon J. 2008. Corporations and Citizenship. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. xii + 250 p.
Damasio A. 2010. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. N. Y.: Pantheon Book. xi + 367 p.
Dunning W.A. 1896. Jean Bodin on Sovereignty. With Some Reference to the Doctrine of Thomas Hobbes. – Political Science Quarterly. Vol. XI. No. 1. P. 82-104.
Greenfield K. 2018. Corporations Are People Too (And They Should Act Like It). New Haven: Yale University Press. xvi + 280 p.
Grovogui S.N. 1996. Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-Determination in International Law. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. xii + 282 p.
Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Toward an Agenda (ed. by T. Kukutai, J. Taylor). 2016. Canberra: Australian National University Press. xxiii + 320 p.
Kugler J., Zak P.J. 2017. Trust, Cooperation, and Conflict: Neuropolitics and International Relations. – Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations (ed. by S.A. Yetiv, P. James). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 83-113.
Maltby J., Day L., Macaskill A. 2017. Personality, Individual Differences and Intelligence. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson. xxvi + 690 p.
Moral Brains: The Neuroscience of Morality (ed. by S.M. Liao). 2016. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. xiv + 365 p.
Neurobiology of Human Values (ed. by J.-P. Changeux, A.R. Damasio, W. Singer, Y. Christen). 2005. Heidelberg: Springer. xv + 159 p.
Osiander A. 2001. Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. – International Organization. Vol. 55. No. 2. P. 251-287.
Pfaff D.W. 2015. The Altruistic Brain: How We Are Naturally Good. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. x + 295 p.
Politics without Sovereignty: A Critique of Contemporary International Relations (ed. by C.J. Bickerton, P.Cunliffe, A.Gourevitch). 2007. N. Y.: UCL Press. xiv + 208 p.
Preference, Belief, and Similarity. Selected Writings by Amos Tversky (ed. by E. Shafir). 2004. Cambridge: MIT Press. xvi + 1023 p.
Schreiber D. 2011. From SCAN to Neuropolitics. – Man is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics (ed. by P.K. Hatemi, R. McDermott). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. P. 273-299.
The Neuroscientific Turn: Transdisciplinarity in the Age of the Brain (ed. by M.M. Littlefield, J.M. Johnson). 2012. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, XIV + 254 p.The Responsibility to Protect. Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. December 2001. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001. XIII + 91 p.
Woodwell D. 2007. Nationalism in International Relations. Norms, Foreign Policy, and Enmity. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. xii + 223 p.ArticleReceived: 04.09.2023
Citation FormatsOther cite formats:
APASurguladze, V. S. (2023). The Emotional Dimension of the State Sovereignty in the Context of Ensuring National Security. Vlast’ (The Authority), 31(4), 108-115. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9698IssueSectionPOLITICAL SCIENCE
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
