The Boundaries of State Sovereignty of the National Segment of Cyberspace
Research Article
How to Cite
Kovrigin D.E. The Boundaries of State Sovereignty of the National Segment of Cyberspace. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2023. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 124-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i1.9473
Abstract
The aim of this article is to study the phenomenon of cyberspace as a new social institution. Various interpretations of the concept of cyberspace in Russian and foreign studies are analyzed. The national segment of cyberspace is considered as a new institution, including both independent segments of society and the state, and a common segment of society and the state. The author defines cyberspace as a hybrid space that includes a set of technical infrastructure and subjects of communication, technological, regulatory processes. The author explores the problem of defining the boundaries of state sovereignty in the national segment of cyberspace, and concludes that the boundaries of state sovereignty in the national segment of cyberspace correspond to the system of relations of participants in the communication, technological, regulatory processes of cyberspace subordinate to the jurisdiction of the state.
Keywords:
cyberspace, state regulation, national segment of cyberspace, boundaries of cyberspace
References
Voiskunskii A.E. 2020. Psikhologiya kibersredy: dva issledovatel'skikh podkhoda. – Ekopsikhologicheskie issledovaniya – 6: ekologiya detstva i psikhologiya ustoichivogo razvitiya. № 6. S. 439-443. (RUS.)
Volodenkov S.V., Fedorchenko S.N. 2022.Traditsionnye politicheskie instituty v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii: riski i perspektivy transformatsii. – Diskurs-Pi. T. 19. № 1. S. 84-103. (RUS.)
Girich V.L., Chuprina V.N. 2007. Global'noe informatsionnoe prostranstvo i problema dostupa k mirovym informatsionnym resursam. – Rossiiskaya gosudarstvennaya biblioteka. URL: http: olden.rsl.ru/upload/mba2007/mba2007_05.pdf (accessed 23.12.2022). (RUS.)
Danel'yan A.A. 2020. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe regulirovanie kiberprostranstva. – Obrazovanie i pravo. № 1. S. 261-269. (RUS.)
Danilenkov A.V. 2017. Gosudarstvennyi suverenitet Rossiiskoi Federatsii v informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnoi seti «Internet». – Lex Russica. № 7(128). S. 154-165 (RUS.)
Dobrovol'skaya I.A. 2014. Ponyatie «Informatsionnoe prostranstvo»: razlichnye podkhody k ego izucheniyu i osobennosti. – Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Literaturovedenie, zhurnalistika. № 4. S. 140-147. (RUS.)
Dorozhkin Yu.N., Gaetkulov E.N. 2022. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya grazhdanskogo protestnogo uchastiya v sovremennoi Rossii.– Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. T. 12. № 2. S. 115-121. (RUS.)
Lipkina N.N. 2021. Printsipy ustanovleniya ekstraterritorial'noi yurisdiktsii gosudarstva v kiberprostranstve v kontekste pravovykh pozitsii Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. – Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. № 2. S. 153-160. (RUS.)
Manoilo A.V. 2003. Gosudarstvennaya informatsionnaya politika v osobykh usloviyakh: monografiya. M.: Izd-vo MIFI. 388 s. (RUS.)
Miguleva M.V. 2020. Kiberprostranstvo kak sotsial'nyi institut: priznaki, funktsii, kharakteristiki – Diskurs-Pi. № 4(41). S. 199-212. (RUS.)
Mukhametov D.R. 2020 Politicheskie riski i bar'ery tsifrovizatsii. – Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. T. 10. № 4. S. 58-64. (RUS.)
Nikiporets-Takigava G.Yu., Buchnev E.V. 2022 Metodologicheskie problemy formirovaniya kontseptsii natsional'noi kiberbezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii. – Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. T. 12. № 1. S. 70-74. (RUS.)
Terent'eva L.V. 2021. Ustanovlenie sudebnoi yurisdiktsii po sporam v kiberprostranstve na primere SShA. – Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. № 2. S. 236-260. (RUS.)
Clark D. 2010. Characterizing Cyberspace: Past, Present and Future. ECIR Working Paper No. 2010-3. MIT Political Science Department. 18 p.
Denning D. 1999. Information Warfare and Security. N.Y.: ACM Press. 522 p.
Lakomy M. 2015 Cyberprzestrzeń jako nowy wymiar rywalizacji i współpracy państw. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. 448 p.
Pilarski G. 2020. Cyberspace as a Tool of Contemporary Propaganda. – Safety & Defense. Vol. 6. Is. P. 95-108.
Rattray G.T. 2004. Strategic Warfare in Cyberspace. MIT Press. 517 p.
Volodenkov S.V., Fedorchenko S.N. 2022.Traditsionnye politicheskie instituty v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii: riski i perspektivy transformatsii. – Diskurs-Pi. T. 19. № 1. S. 84-103. (RUS.)
Girich V.L., Chuprina V.N. 2007. Global'noe informatsionnoe prostranstvo i problema dostupa k mirovym informatsionnym resursam. – Rossiiskaya gosudarstvennaya biblioteka. URL: http: olden.rsl.ru/upload/mba2007/mba2007_05.pdf (accessed 23.12.2022). (RUS.)
Danel'yan A.A. 2020. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe regulirovanie kiberprostranstva. – Obrazovanie i pravo. № 1. S. 261-269. (RUS.)
Danilenkov A.V. 2017. Gosudarstvennyi suverenitet Rossiiskoi Federatsii v informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnoi seti «Internet». – Lex Russica. № 7(128). S. 154-165 (RUS.)
Dobrovol'skaya I.A. 2014. Ponyatie «Informatsionnoe prostranstvo»: razlichnye podkhody k ego izucheniyu i osobennosti. – Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Literaturovedenie, zhurnalistika. № 4. S. 140-147. (RUS.)
Dorozhkin Yu.N., Gaetkulov E.N. 2022. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya grazhdanskogo protestnogo uchastiya v sovremennoi Rossii.– Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. T. 12. № 2. S. 115-121. (RUS.)
Lipkina N.N. 2021. Printsipy ustanovleniya ekstraterritorial'noi yurisdiktsii gosudarstva v kiberprostranstve v kontekste pravovykh pozitsii Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. – Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. № 2. S. 153-160. (RUS.)
Manoilo A.V. 2003. Gosudarstvennaya informatsionnaya politika v osobykh usloviyakh: monografiya. M.: Izd-vo MIFI. 388 s. (RUS.)
Miguleva M.V. 2020. Kiberprostranstvo kak sotsial'nyi institut: priznaki, funktsii, kharakteristiki – Diskurs-Pi. № 4(41). S. 199-212. (RUS.)
Mukhametov D.R. 2020 Politicheskie riski i bar'ery tsifrovizatsii. – Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. T. 10. № 4. S. 58-64. (RUS.)
Nikiporets-Takigava G.Yu., Buchnev E.V. 2022 Metodologicheskie problemy formirovaniya kontseptsii natsional'noi kiberbezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii. – Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. T. 12. № 1. S. 70-74. (RUS.)
Terent'eva L.V. 2021. Ustanovlenie sudebnoi yurisdiktsii po sporam v kiberprostranstve na primere SShA. – Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. № 2. S. 236-260. (RUS.)
Clark D. 2010. Characterizing Cyberspace: Past, Present and Future. ECIR Working Paper No. 2010-3. MIT Political Science Department. 18 p.
Denning D. 1999. Information Warfare and Security. N.Y.: ACM Press. 522 p.
Lakomy M. 2015 Cyberprzestrzeń jako nowy wymiar rywalizacji i współpracy państw. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. 448 p.
Pilarski G. 2020. Cyberspace as a Tool of Contemporary Propaganda. – Safety & Defense. Vol. 6. Is. P. 95-108.
Rattray G.T. 2004. Strategic Warfare in Cyberspace. MIT Press. 517 p.
Article
Received: 07.03.2023
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Kovrigin, D. E. (2023). The Boundaries of State Sovereignty of the National Segment of Cyberspace. Vlast’ (The Authority), 31(1), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i1.9473
Issue
Section
POLITICAL SCIENCE
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
