Military and Political Aspects of the Defeat of Japanese Troops in the Far East

Research Article
  • Aleksandr Nikolaevich Romanenko Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences anr88@mail.ru
How to Cite
Romanenko A.N. Military and Political Aspects of the Defeat of Japanese Troops in the Far East. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2022. Vol. 30. No. 6. P. 235-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i6.9383

Abstract

The end of the Second World War was significantly accelerated by the entry of the USSR into the war against Japan and the liquidation of the Kwantung Army. The formal violation of the neutrality treaty was justified by both the unfriendly position of Japan, its support for Germany, and the desire to end the largest war in history quickly, to avoid new victims and eliminate the hotbed of military tension near the borders of the USSR. In view of the obvious and overwhelming advantage of the Soviet Army in training, experience, tactical thinking and in all types of weapons, the outcome of the 1945 summer campaign in the Far East was beyond doubt. At the same time, the Japanese military-political leadership nevertheless got involved in the conflict, protecting the annexed territory, which brought new, senseless sacrifices. The international legal causes and consequences of these events remain the subject of discussion.
Keywords:
World War II; Kwantung Army; Far East; Japan; Manchuria

Author Biography

Aleksandr Nikolaevich Romanenko, Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
postgraduate student

References

Alad'in V.V. 2001. Rossiya i Yaponiya: propushchennye vekhi na puti k mirnomu dogovoru. M.: Bimpa. 240 s. (RUS.)



Zilanov V.K. i dr. 1995. Russkie Kurily: istoriya i sovremennost'. M. 181 s. (RUS.)



Koshkin A.A. 2010. Rossiya i Yaponiya: Uzly protivorechii. M.: Veche. 480 s. (RUS.)



Koshkin A.A. 2011. «Kantokuen» – «Barbarossa» po-yaponski. Pochemu Yaponiya ne napala na SSSR. M.: Veche. 384 s. (RUS.)



Kryukov I. V. 2012. Boevaya podgotovka v voiskakh Dal'nevostochnogo fronta v period Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny 1941–1945 godov. – Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. № 7(261). S. 43-50. (RUS.)



Latyshev I.A. 2005. Putin i Yaponiya. Budut li ustupki? 2000–2005. M.: Eksmo; Algoritm. 416 s. (RUS.)



Middel'dorf E. 1958. Taktika v russkoi kampanii (per. s nem.). M.: Voenizdat. 366 s. (RUS.)



Molodyakov V.E. 2005. Rossiya i Yaponiya: mech na vesakh. Neizvestnye i zabytye stranitsy rossiisko-yaponskikh otnoshenii (1929–1948). M.: AST; Astrel'; Tranzit-kniga. 379 s. (RUS.)



Slavinskii B.N. 1995. Pakt o neitralitete mezhdu SSSR i Yaponiei: diplomaticheskaya istoriya, 1941–1945 gg. M.: TOO «Novina». 335 s. (RUS.)



Tkacheva G.A. 2015. Oboronnyi potentsial Dal'nego Vostoka SSSR v gody Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny. – Rossiya i ATR. № 2(88). S. 5-24. (RUS.)



Shagov A.E. 2020. Gruppirovka sovetskikh voisk na Dal'nem Vostoke kak faktor sderzhivaniya agressii Yaponii v gody Vtoroi mirovoi voiny. – 75 let Pobedy: Sovetskii Soyuz i zavershenie Vtoroi mirovoi voiny na Dal'nem Vostoke (otv. red. Yu.A. Nikiforov). SPb: Nestor-Istoriya. 696 s. (RUS.)



Jowett Ph. 2004. Rays of the Rising Sun. Japan's Asian Allies 1931–45, China and Manchukuo. Vol. 1. Helion and Company Ltd. 144 p.



Why Did Japan Choose War? – American Historical Association. URL: https://www.historians.org/about-aha-and-membership/aha-history-and-archives/gi-roundtable-series/pamphlets/em-15-what-shall-be-done-about-japan-after-victory-(1945)/why-did-japan-choose-war (accessed 31.10.2022).
Article

Received: 22.12.2022

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Romanenko, A. N. (2022). Military and Political Aspects of the Defeat of Japanese Troops in the Far East. Vlast’ (The Authority), 30(6), 235-241. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i6.9383
Section
DOMESTIC EXPERIENCE