Sociological Dimension of Discontent in Modern Russian Society
Research Article
-
Roman Vasilyevich Parma
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
rvparma@mail.ru
Elibrary Author_id 919176How to CiteParma R.V. Sociological Dimension of Discontent in Modern Russian Society. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2022. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 129-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i4.9138
Abstract
The article presents the results of an applied study of social discontent in modern Russian society. The author proposes a theoretical framework for studying discontent as a sociological phenomenon, supported by data obtained during the implementation of a mass online survey of Russians, as well as comparing them with a number of authoritative studies of public opinion. The article considers various factors that determine the level of social discontent among Russians. According to the author, the phenomenon of discontent is multicomponent and has several dimensions: personal, socio-economic and civil-political, which is confirmed by the conditionality of social discontent by a complex of reasons. The results demonstrate the consistency of the research data in terms of measuring the social discontent of the Russian society, as well as a clear relationship with the level of its protest potential.Keywords:electoral attitudes; electoral expectations; youth; image of the future; cognitive instrumental diagnostics; sand play modeling; metaphorical associative cardsAuthor Biography
Roman Vasilyevich Parma, Financial University under the Government of the Russian FederationCand.Sci. (Pol.Sci.), Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass CommunicationReferences
Baskakova Yu.M. 2013. Nedovol'nye i nesoglasnye: sotsial'noe nedovol'stvo i ego masshtaby (Chast' I). – Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. № 2(114). S. 24-32. (RUS.)
Garr T. 2005. Pochemu lyudi buntuyut. SPb: Piter. 464 s. (RUS.)
Lebon G. 2011. Psikhologiya narodov i mass. M.: Akademicheskii proekt. 238 s. (RUS.)
Levada Yu.A. 1999. Chelovek nedovol'nyi: protest i terpenie. – Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. № 6. S. 7-13. (RUS.)
Rezaev A.V., Lisitsyn P.P., Stepanov A.M. 2014. Chastichnoe soprichastie kak element podderzhaniya kollektivnogo nedovol'stva. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 12. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. Pedagogika. № 2. S. 186-195. (RUS.)
Castells M. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press. 346 p.
Collins R. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 464 p.
Davies J.C. 1962. Toward a Theory of Revolution. – American Sociological Review. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 5-19.
Grasso M., Giugni M. 2016. Protest Participation and Economic Crisis: The Conditioning Role of Political Opportunities. – European Journal of Political Research. Vol. 55. No. 4. P. 663-680.
Klandermans P. 1997. The Social Psychology of Protest. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. 272 p.
McAdam D. 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 346 p.
McCarthy J.D., Zald M.N. 1977. Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. – American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 82. No. 6. P. 1212-1241.
Runciman W.G. 1967. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-century England. – American Sociological Review. Vol. 73. No. 1. P. 127-128.
Smelser N. 1962. Theory of Collective Behavior. N.Y.: Free Press. 452 p.ArticleReceived: 29.08.2022
Citation FormatsOther cite formats:
APAParma, R. V. (2022). Sociological Dimension of Discontent in Modern Russian Society. Vlast’ (The Authority), 30(4), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i4.9138IssueSectionSOCIOLOGYFollowing the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.