Arctic Policy and Scientific Diplomacy in the Eastern Dimension
Research Article
-
Natal'ya Alekseevna Mikhalchenkova
Saint Petersburg State University
mehedova@yandex.ru
Elibrary Author_id 700173How to CiteMikhalchenkova N.A. Arctic Policy and Scientific Diplomacy in the Eastern Dimension. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2022. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 197-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i3.9067
Abstract
The article reveals the importance of research in the Arctic region, analyzes the scientific directions of research in the region, analyzes the directions of the Arctic policy of the People's Republic of China. The author reveals the significance of the humanitarian mission of science and scientific diplomacy in the international cooperation of countries.Keywords:Arctic; politics; science; scientific diplomacy; international relations; PRCReferences
Bol'shakov S.N. 2017. Arkticheskii region v spektre geoekonomicheckikh i geopoliticheskikh interesov. – Evropeiskaya zona rossiiskoi Arktiki: stsenarii razvitiya: sbornik materialov vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Syktyvkar. Izd-vo KRAGSiU. S. 57-61. (RUS.)
Bol'shakov S.N. 2018. Arkticheskie napravleniya politiki Finlyandii: geopoliticheskoe i geoekonomicheskoe napravleniya. – Vestnik Komi respublikanskoi akademii gosudarstvennoi sluzhby i upravleniya: teoriya i praktika upravleniya. № 20(25). S. 210-216 (RUS.)
Bertelsen R.G. 2016. Triple-helix Knowledge-based Sino-Nordic Arctic Relationships for Trust and Sustainable Development. – Advances in Polar Science. Vol. 27. Is. 3. P. 180-184.
Brady A.-M. 2017. China as a Polar Great Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vii+273 p.
He J., Zhang F. 2012. 从北极国家的北极政策剖析北极科技发展趋势 [The Development of Arctic Science and Technology Based on the Arctic Policies of Arctic Nations]. – Chinese Journal of Polar Research. Vol. 4 (December). P. 408-414.
Jakobson L., Peng J.C. 2012. China’s Arctic Aspirations: SIPRI Policy Paper No. 34. URL: https://www.sipri.org/publications/2012/sipri-policy-papers/chinas-arctic-aspirations (accessed 30.04.2022).
Jasanoff S. 2013. Epistemic Subsidiarity-coexistence, Cosmopolitanism, Constitutionalism. – European Journal of Risk Regulation. Vol. 4. Is. 2. P. 133-141.
Leichenko R., O’Brien K. 2008. Environmental Change and Globalization: Double Exposures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 192 p.
Peng J., Wegge N. 2014. China and the Law of the Sea: Implications for Arctic Governance. – The Polar Journal. Vol. 4. Is. 2/ P. 287-305.
Su Ping, Mayer M. 2018. Science Diplomacy and Trust Building: ‘Science China’ in the Arctic. – Global Policy. Vol. 9. Is. 3. P. 23-30.
Su P., Lanteigne M. 2015. China’s Developing Arctic Policies: Myths and Misconceptions. – Journal of China and International Relations. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 21-25. URL: https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/jcir/article/view/1144 (accesse 01.05.2022).
Yang H. 2012. Development of China’s Polar Linkages. – Canadian Naval Review. Vol. 8. Is. 3. P. 1-30.
Yang J., Yu H. 2014. The Community of Chinese Scientists and the Agenda Setting of Arctic Governance. [中国科学学家群体与北极治理议程的设定]. – Journal of International Relations. Vol. 6 (November/December). P. 37-49.ArticleReceived: 06.07.2022
Citation FormatsOther cite formats:
APAMikhalchenkova, N. A. (2022). Arctic Policy and Scientific Diplomacy in the Eastern Dimension. Vlast’ (The Authority), 30(3), 197-201. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i3.9067IssueSectionEXPERTISE
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
