The Armed Conflict in Syria and the Problem of Settlement: Political Realism of Morgenthau is Still Relevant
Research Article
How to Cite
Barakat I. The Armed Conflict in Syria and the Problem of Settlement: Political Realism of Morgenthau is Still Relevant. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2020. Vol. 28. No. 3. P. 275-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i3.7359
Abstract
The article deals with the settlement of the armed conflict in Syria. The author reveals the powerlessness of the UN and the large role of several states important in the region, such as the Russian Federation, the United States, Turkey and Iran in overcoming the crisis. The author determines the correctness of the concept of political realism in the analysis of the development of international relations on the Syrian issue. The article proves that the ideas of G. Morgenthau and his followers have not lost their significance in modern realities and that the concepts of national interest and great power are more important for the analysis of international relations than universal moral principles.
Keywords:
Syria; UN; armed conflict; settlement; political realism; international organizations; actors; success
References
Akbarov F.Kh. 2014. Ponyatie «natsional'nyi interes», ego sushchnost' i osobennosti. – Vestnik Tadzhikskogo natsional'nogo universiteta. T. 1. № 3-8. S. 148-152. (RUS.)
Antoshchenko D.V. 2019. Uchastie RF v uregulirovanii konflikta v Sirii cherez prizmu politicheskogo realizma. – Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. № 7. S. 135-137. (RUS.)
Ignatkin O.B. 2013. Idei politicheskogo realizma v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. – Vestnik RGGU. Ser. Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Zarubezhnoe regionovedenie. Vostokovedenie. № 21(122). S. 74-82. (RUS.)
Lebedeva M.M., Ustinkin S.V. 2000. Mirovaya politika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: klyuchevye slova i ponyatiya. N. Novgorod: NNGU. 208 s. (RUS.)
Mutagirov D.Z. 2016. Est' li, i mozhet li sushchestvovat' nauchnaya teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii? – Filosofiya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Ot teorii k praktike: sbornik statei (otv. red. S.N. Pogodin, I.D. Osipov). SPb: Izd-vo SPbGU. S. 17-42. (RUS.)
Panchenko M.Yu. 2009. Realistskaya paradigma mezhdunarodnogo poryadka: Proshloe i nastoyashchee. – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 5. S. 6-17. (RUS.)
Petukhova E.N. 2019. Rol' Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii v protsesse uregulirovaniya siriiskogo krizisa 2011–2018 godov. – Evraziiskoe nauchnoe ob"edinenie. № 4-6 (50). S. 398-403. (RUS.)
Plotnikov A.I. 2017. Rol' Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii v uregulirovanii vooruzhennogo konflikta v Siriiskoi Arabskoi Respublike (na osnove rezolyutsii Soveta Bezopasnosti OON). – Sotsial'no-politicheskie i istoriko-kul'turnye aspekty sovremennoi geopoliticheskoi situatsii: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii X Nauchno-obrazovatel'nogo foruma (pod red. V.V. Bobyleva). S. 321-325. (RUS.)
Savranskaya D.F. 2016. Deyatel'nost' OON v uregulirovanie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov. – Innovatsionnaya nauka. № 5-3(17). S. 44-47. (RUS.)
Saidov A.Kh., Kashinskaya L.F. 2005. Natsional'naya bezopasnost' i natsional'nye interesy: Vzaimosvyaz' i vzaimodeistvie (opyt politiko-pravovogo analiza). – Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. № 12(108). S. 119-126. (RUS.)
Setov N.R. 2011. Teoriya nastupatel'nogo realizma Dzh. Miersheimera. – Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS. T. 7. № 1. S. 54-61. (RUS.)
Tkachenko M.A. 2008. Ponyatie «natsional'nyi interes» v evropeiskoi gosudarstvenno-pravovoi mysli. – Filosofiya prava. № 5(30). S. 102-105. (RUS.)
Trukhachev V.V. 2010. Natsional'nye interesy: teoreticheskii diskurs problemy. – Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser. Politologiya. № 1. S. 53-65. (RUS.)
Khodynskaya-Golenishcheva M.S. 2019. Siriya: trudnyi put' ot voiny k miru. Mnogostoronnyaya diplomatiya siriiskogo uregulirovaniya. M.: Abris. 719 s. (RUS.)
Yashkova T.A. 2016. Osnovnye aspekty termina «velikaya derzhava». – Novaya nauka: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti razvitiya. № 3-2. S. 50-52. (RUS.)
Antoshchenko D.V. 2019. Uchastie RF v uregulirovanii konflikta v Sirii cherez prizmu politicheskogo realizma. – Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. № 7. S. 135-137. (RUS.)
Ignatkin O.B. 2013. Idei politicheskogo realizma v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. – Vestnik RGGU. Ser. Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Zarubezhnoe regionovedenie. Vostokovedenie. № 21(122). S. 74-82. (RUS.)
Lebedeva M.M., Ustinkin S.V. 2000. Mirovaya politika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: klyuchevye slova i ponyatiya. N. Novgorod: NNGU. 208 s. (RUS.)
Mutagirov D.Z. 2016. Est' li, i mozhet li sushchestvovat' nauchnaya teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii? – Filosofiya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Ot teorii k praktike: sbornik statei (otv. red. S.N. Pogodin, I.D. Osipov). SPb: Izd-vo SPbGU. S. 17-42. (RUS.)
Panchenko M.Yu. 2009. Realistskaya paradigma mezhdunarodnogo poryadka: Proshloe i nastoyashchee. – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 5. S. 6-17. (RUS.)
Petukhova E.N. 2019. Rol' Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii v protsesse uregulirovaniya siriiskogo krizisa 2011–2018 godov. – Evraziiskoe nauchnoe ob"edinenie. № 4-6 (50). S. 398-403. (RUS.)
Plotnikov A.I. 2017. Rol' Organizatsii Ob"edinennykh Natsii v uregulirovanii vooruzhennogo konflikta v Siriiskoi Arabskoi Respublike (na osnove rezolyutsii Soveta Bezopasnosti OON). – Sotsial'no-politicheskie i istoriko-kul'turnye aspekty sovremennoi geopoliticheskoi situatsii: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii X Nauchno-obrazovatel'nogo foruma (pod red. V.V. Bobyleva). S. 321-325. (RUS.)
Savranskaya D.F. 2016. Deyatel'nost' OON v uregulirovanie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov. – Innovatsionnaya nauka. № 5-3(17). S. 44-47. (RUS.)
Saidov A.Kh., Kashinskaya L.F. 2005. Natsional'naya bezopasnost' i natsional'nye interesy: Vzaimosvyaz' i vzaimodeistvie (opyt politiko-pravovogo analiza). – Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. № 12(108). S. 119-126. (RUS.)
Setov N.R. 2011. Teoriya nastupatel'nogo realizma Dzh. Miersheimera. – Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS. T. 7. № 1. S. 54-61. (RUS.)
Tkachenko M.A. 2008. Ponyatie «natsional'nyi interes» v evropeiskoi gosudarstvenno-pravovoi mysli. – Filosofiya prava. № 5(30). S. 102-105. (RUS.)
Trukhachev V.V. 2010. Natsional'nye interesy: teoreticheskii diskurs problemy. – Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser. Politologiya. № 1. S. 53-65. (RUS.)
Khodynskaya-Golenishcheva M.S. 2019. Siriya: trudnyi put' ot voiny k miru. Mnogostoronnyaya diplomatiya siriiskogo uregulirovaniya. M.: Abris. 719 s. (RUS.)
Yashkova T.A. 2016. Osnovnye aspekty termina «velikaya derzhava». – Novaya nauka: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti razvitiya. № 3-2. S. 50-52. (RUS.)
Article
Received: 30.06.2020
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Barakat, I. (2020). The Armed Conflict in Syria and the Problem of Settlement: Political Realism of Morgenthau is Still Relevant. Vlast’ (The Authority), 28(3), 275-279. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i3.7359
Issue
Section
FOCUS ON POLITICS
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
