Political Discourse as a Communicative Practice of Constructing Virtual Political Reality
-
Nadezhda Borisovna Belugina
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
belugina.nb@gmail.com
Elibrary Author_id 993404
- Liliya Vyacheslavovna Ryazanova Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation liliya_ryazanova@mail.ru
How to CiteBelugina N.B., Ryazanova L.V. Political Discourse as a Communicative Practice of Constructing Virtual Political Reality. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2020. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 82-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i2.7138Abstract
On the base of a postmodern approach to understanding modernity, the authors identify the conditions of origin and the essence of a new phenomenon called virtual political reality and outline theoretical approaches to understanding of social and communicative practices of its construction. They emphasize that these phenomena, as well as discursive practices, are of a symbolic nature. Political discourse is considered as a communicative practice of creating semantic meanings of certain political phenomena and actions. The authors raise the issue of the mutual influence of discourse and social reality, considering the transformation of political discourse as a tool for constructing and changing virtual political reality.Keywords:social practices, communicative practices, discourse, political discourse, virtual political realityAuthor Biographies
Nadezhda Borisovna Belugina, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federationpostgraduate student at the Department of Political Science and Mass CommunicationsLiliya Vyacheslavovna Ryazanova, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federationpostgraduate student; Assistant at the Department of Political Science and Mass CommunicationsReferences
Bart R. 1989. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress. 616 s. (RUS.)
Berger P., Lukman T. 1995. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. M.: Medium. 323 s. (RUS.)
Bodriiyar Zh. 2013. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert'. M.: Dobrosvet. 392 s. (RUS.)
Bodriiyar Zh. 2018. Simulyakry i simulyatsii. M: Ripol Klassik; Postum. 320 s. (RUS.)
Burd'e P. 1993. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo i simvolicheskaya vlast'. Parizh. 1993. S. 137-150. (RUS.)
Garfinkel' G. 2007. Issledovaniya po etnometodologii. SPb: Piter. 335 s. (RUS.)
Giddens E. 2005. Ustroenie obshchestva: Ocherk teorii strukturatsii. 2-e izd. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt. 528 s. (RUS.)
Deik T.A., van. 1989. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya. M.: Progress. 308 s. (RUS.)
Dugin A.G. 2009. Postfilosofiya. Tri paradigmy v istorii mysli. M.: Evraziiskoe dvizhenie. 744 s. (RUS.)
Kastel's M. 2000. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura. M.: ID GU-VShE. 608 s. (RUS.)
Lotman Yu.M. 1999. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek ‒ tekst ‒ semiosfera ‒ istoriya. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury. 464 s. (RUS.)
Malinova O.Yu. 2012. Simvolicheskaya politika: kontury problemnogo polya. – Simvolicheskaya politika. Vyp. 1. Konstruirovanie predstavlenii o proshlom kak vlastnyi resurs: sbornik nauchnykh trudov (nauchn. red. O.Yu. Malinova). 2012. M.: INION RAN. S. 5-16. (RUS.)
Simvolicheskaya politika. Vyp. 1. Konstruirovanie predstavlenii o proshlom kak vlastnyi resurs: sbornik nauchnykh trudov (nauchn. red. O.Yu. Malinova). 2012. M.: INION RAN. 334 s. (RUS.)
Fillips L.Dzh., Iorgensen M.V. 2008. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod. Khar'kov: Gumanitarnyi tsentr. 352 s. (RUS.)
Khabermas Yu. 2001. Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoi teorii. SPb: Nauka. 417 s. (RUS.)ArticleReceived: 21.04.2020
Citation FormatsOther cite formats:
APABelugina, N. B., & Ryazanova, L. V. (2020). Political Discourse as a Communicative Practice of Constructing Virtual Political Reality. Vlast’ (The Authority), 28(2), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i2.7138IssueSectionGLOBALISATION AND DIGITAL SOCIETYFollowing the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.