Political Discourse as a Communicative Practice of Constructing Virtual Political Reality

  • Nadezhda Borisovna Belugina Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation belugina.nb@gmail.com
    Elibrary Author_id 993404
  • Liliya Vyacheslavovna Ryazanova Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation liliya_ryazanova@mail.ru
How to Cite
Belugina N.B., Ryazanova L.V. Political Discourse as a Communicative Practice of Constructing Virtual Political Reality. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2020. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 82-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i2.7138

Abstract

On the base of a postmodern approach to understanding modernity, the authors identify the conditions of origin and the essence of a new phenomenon called virtual political reality and outline theoretical approaches to understanding of social and communicative practices of its construction. They emphasize that these phenomena, as well as discursive practices, are of a symbolic nature. Political discourse is considered as a communicative practice of creating semantic meanings of certain political phenomena and actions. The authors raise the issue of the mutual influence of discourse and social reality, considering the transformation of political discourse as a tool for constructing and changing virtual political reality.
Keywords:
social practices, communicative practices, discourse, political discourse, virtual political reality

Author Biographies

Nadezhda Borisovna Belugina, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
postgraduate student at the Department of Political Science and Mass Communications
Liliya Vyacheslavovna Ryazanova, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
postgraduate student; Assistant at the Department of Political Science and Mass Communications

References

Bart R. 1989. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Poetika. M.: Progress. 616 s. (RUS.)



Berger P., Lukman T. 1995. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. M.: Medium. 323 s. (RUS.)



Bodriiyar Zh. 2013. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert'. M.: Dobrosvet. 392 s. (RUS.)



Bodriiyar Zh. 2018. Simulyakry i simulyatsii. M: Ripol Klassik; Postum. 320 s. (RUS.)



Burd'e P. 1993. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo i simvolicheskaya vlast'. Parizh. 1993. S. 137-150. (RUS.)



Garfinkel' G. 2007. Issledovaniya po etnometodologii. SPb: Piter. 335 s. (RUS.)



Giddens E. 2005. Ustroenie obshchestva: Ocherk teorii strukturatsii. 2-e izd. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt. 528 s. (RUS.)



Deik T.A., van. 1989. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikatsiya. M.: Progress. 308 s. (RUS.)



Dugin A.G. 2009. Postfilosofiya. Tri paradigmy v istorii mysli. M.: Evraziiskoe dvizhenie. 744 s. (RUS.)



Kastel's M. 2000. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura. M.: ID GU-VShE. 608 s. (RUS.)



Lotman Yu.M. 1999. Vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Chelovek ‒ tekst ‒ semiosfera ‒ istoriya. M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury. 464 s. (RUS.)



Malinova O.Yu. 2012. Simvolicheskaya politika: kontury problemnogo polya. – Simvolicheskaya politika. Vyp. 1. Konstruirovanie predstavlenii o proshlom kak vlastnyi resurs: sbornik nauchnykh trudov (nauchn. red. O.Yu. Malinova). 2012. M.: INION RAN. S. 5-16. (RUS.)



Simvolicheskaya politika. Vyp. 1. Konstruirovanie predstavlenii o proshlom kak vlastnyi resurs: sbornik nauchnykh trudov (nauchn. red. O.Yu. Malinova). 2012. M.: INION RAN. 334 s. (RUS.)



Fillips L.Dzh., Iorgensen M.V. 2008. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod. Khar'kov: Gumanitarnyi tsentr. 352 s. (RUS.)



Khabermas Yu. 2001. Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoi teorii. SPb: Nauka. 417 s. (RUS.)
Article

Received: 21.04.2020

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Belugina, N. B., & Ryazanova, L. V. (2020). Political Discourse as a Communicative Practice of Constructing Virtual Political Reality. Vlast’ (The Authority), 28(2), 82-88. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i2.7138
Section
GLOBALISATION AND DIGITAL SOCIETY