Social Recovery after Disasters at Nuclear Sites: Sociological Support of Decision Making
How to Cite
Mozgovaya A.V. Social Recovery after Disasters at Nuclear Sites: Sociological Support of Decision Making. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2016. Vol. 24. No. 6. P. 107-115.
Abstract
Basing on the document and scientific publications analysis, the author proves that the main part of disaster concepts in the field of decision-making treated damage only as material and health wane. Large scale accidents (Bhopal (India), Sevezo (Spain) and Chernobyl (Russia) proved the ideas that social damage and social consequences for life style, values, world views of victims are even more important than the material impact. The author analyzes the data of sociological surveys concerning social problems of Chernobyl victims in the spheres of life values structure, migration orientations, family relations and children birth planning, business, education, social protection. As the result of previous analysis, the author presents and proves the main positions of social recovery concept starting from sociological monitoring data as the first stage of social processes managing, including mitigation of risk and disaster consequences.
Keywords:
social recovery, social consequences, life style, risk, Chernobyl victims, social support of decision-making
References
Agatstsi E. 1998. Moral'noe izmerenie nauki i tekhniki. (per. s angl. I. Borisovoi, nauch. red. V.A. Lektorskii). M.: Moskovskii Filosofskii fond. 343 s. (RUS.)
Golovakha E.I., Panina N.V., Churilov N.I. 1991. Obshchestvennoe mnenie o sovremennom sostoyanii i perspektivakh razvitiya atomnoi energetiki. – Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 8. S. 51-55. (RUS.)
Grigor'eva R.A., Listova T.A. 2012. Sreda obitaniya i naselenie Chernobyl'skoi zony Bryanskoi oblasti. – Sotsiokul'turnye posledstviya Chernobyl'skoi avarii. Issledovaniya po prikladnoi i neotlozhnoi etnologii. Vyp. 230/231. M.: IEA RAN. S. 11-29. (RUS.)
Zorina A.E., Mozgovaya A.V. 2016. Otvetstvennost' vlasti i naseleniya v usloviyakh riska: faktor doveriya. – Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika. № 1(13). S. 71-92. (RUS.)
Kroz M.V., Lipatov S.A., Chinkina O.V. 1993. Osobennosti vospriyatiya riska radiatsionnogo vozdeistviya spetsialistami i nespetsialistami v oblasti atomnoi energetiki. – Voprosy psikhologii. № 5. S. 59-66. (RUS.)
Kurochkina A.E. 2008. Riskovaya kommunikatsiya v oblasti yadernoi energetiki: opyt Velikobritanii, Shvetsii, Frantsii, Rossii. – Sotsiologicheskie koordinaty riska (pod red. A.V. Mozgovoi. M.: Izd-vo IC RAN. S. 164-177. (RUS.)
Mimandusova G.I., Privalov Yu.A., Saenko Yu.I. 1999. Sotsial'nyi monitoring postchernobyl'skoi situatsii. – Sotsis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 10. S. 114-120. (RUS.)
Mozgovaya A.V., Shlykova E.V. 1994. Kachestvo zhizni uchastnikov likvidatsii posledstvii chernobyl'skoi katastrofy. M.: IS RosAN. 77 s. (RUS.)
Mozgovaya A.V. 1998. Ekologicheski ustoichivoe razvitie i obraz zhizni: sotsiologicheskii podkhod. – Rossiya: riski i opasnosti «perekhodnogo» obshchestva. M.: Izd-vo IC RAN. S. 60-84. (RUS.)
Mozgovaya A.V. 1999. Ekologicheski ustoichivyi obraz zhizni: faktory stanovleniya. – Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 8. S. 104-111. (RUS.)
Mozgovaya A.V. 2011. Izmerenie riska v sotsiologii: metodologiya, metody, rezul'taty. – Risk: issledovaniya i sotsial'naya praktika (otv. red. A.V. Mozgovaya). M.: IC RAN. S. 40-59. (RUS.)
Nikitin S.M., Feofanov K.A. 1992. Sotsiologicheskaya teoriya riska v poiskakh predmeta. – Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 10. S. 120-127. (RUS.)
Osobennosti sotsial'nogo povedeniya naseleniya regiona, postradavshego ot chernobyl'skoi katastrofy. 1993. M.: IS RosAN. 98 s. (RUS.)
Sotsial'naya i psikhologicheskaya reabilitatsiya postradavshikh ot chernobyl'skoi katastrofy: opyt i perspekt ivy. 1996. M.: IS RosAN. 238 s. (RUS.)
Sotsial'noe samochuvstvie naseleniya v usloviyakh povyshennogo ekologicheskogo riska. 1992. M.: IS RosAN. 25 s. (RUS.)
Sotsial'nye posledstviya chernobyl'skoi avarii. 1992. M.: IS RosAN. 59 s. (RUS.)
Barton A.H. 1970. Communities in Disaster: a Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books Doubleday & Company, Inc. 352 p.
Edwards M. 1994. Living with the monster: Chernobyl. – National Geographic. Vol. 186. P. 100-115.
Lidell M.K., Perry R.W. 1990. Effects of the Chernobyl Accident on Public Perceptions of Nuclear Plant Accident Risks. – Risk Analysis. Vol. 10. No 3. P. 393-399.
Shrivastava P. 1992. Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. 169 p.
Golovakha E.I., Panina N.V., Churilov N.I. 1991. Obshchestvennoe mnenie o sovremennom sostoyanii i perspektivakh razvitiya atomnoi energetiki. – Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 8. S. 51-55. (RUS.)
Grigor'eva R.A., Listova T.A. 2012. Sreda obitaniya i naselenie Chernobyl'skoi zony Bryanskoi oblasti. – Sotsiokul'turnye posledstviya Chernobyl'skoi avarii. Issledovaniya po prikladnoi i neotlozhnoi etnologii. Vyp. 230/231. M.: IEA RAN. S. 11-29. (RUS.)
Zorina A.E., Mozgovaya A.V. 2016. Otvetstvennost' vlasti i naseleniya v usloviyakh riska: faktor doveriya. – Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial'naya praktika. № 1(13). S. 71-92. (RUS.)
Kroz M.V., Lipatov S.A., Chinkina O.V. 1993. Osobennosti vospriyatiya riska radiatsionnogo vozdeistviya spetsialistami i nespetsialistami v oblasti atomnoi energetiki. – Voprosy psikhologii. № 5. S. 59-66. (RUS.)
Kurochkina A.E. 2008. Riskovaya kommunikatsiya v oblasti yadernoi energetiki: opyt Velikobritanii, Shvetsii, Frantsii, Rossii. – Sotsiologicheskie koordinaty riska (pod red. A.V. Mozgovoi. M.: Izd-vo IC RAN. S. 164-177. (RUS.)
Mimandusova G.I., Privalov Yu.A., Saenko Yu.I. 1999. Sotsial'nyi monitoring postchernobyl'skoi situatsii. – Sotsis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 10. S. 114-120. (RUS.)
Mozgovaya A.V., Shlykova E.V. 1994. Kachestvo zhizni uchastnikov likvidatsii posledstvii chernobyl'skoi katastrofy. M.: IS RosAN. 77 s. (RUS.)
Mozgovaya A.V. 1998. Ekologicheski ustoichivoe razvitie i obraz zhizni: sotsiologicheskii podkhod. – Rossiya: riski i opasnosti «perekhodnogo» obshchestva. M.: Izd-vo IC RAN. S. 60-84. (RUS.)
Mozgovaya A.V. 1999. Ekologicheski ustoichivyi obraz zhizni: faktory stanovleniya. – Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 8. S. 104-111. (RUS.)
Mozgovaya A.V. 2011. Izmerenie riska v sotsiologii: metodologiya, metody, rezul'taty. – Risk: issledovaniya i sotsial'naya praktika (otv. red. A.V. Mozgovaya). M.: IC RAN. S. 40-59. (RUS.)
Nikitin S.M., Feofanov K.A. 1992. Sotsiologicheskaya teoriya riska v poiskakh predmeta. – Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 10. S. 120-127. (RUS.)
Osobennosti sotsial'nogo povedeniya naseleniya regiona, postradavshego ot chernobyl'skoi katastrofy. 1993. M.: IS RosAN. 98 s. (RUS.)
Sotsial'naya i psikhologicheskaya reabilitatsiya postradavshikh ot chernobyl'skoi katastrofy: opyt i perspekt ivy. 1996. M.: IS RosAN. 238 s. (RUS.)
Sotsial'noe samochuvstvie naseleniya v usloviyakh povyshennogo ekologicheskogo riska. 1992. M.: IS RosAN. 25 s. (RUS.)
Sotsial'nye posledstviya chernobyl'skoi avarii. 1992. M.: IS RosAN. 59 s. (RUS.)
Barton A.H. 1970. Communities in Disaster: a Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations. Garden City, New York: Anchor Books Doubleday & Company, Inc. 352 p.
Edwards M. 1994. Living with the monster: Chernobyl. – National Geographic. Vol. 186. P. 100-115.
Lidell M.K., Perry R.W. 1990. Effects of the Chernobyl Accident on Public Perceptions of Nuclear Plant Accident Risks. – Risk Analysis. Vol. 10. No 3. P. 393-399.
Shrivastava P. 1992. Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. 169 p.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Mozgovaya, A. V. (2016). Social Recovery after Disasters at Nuclear Sites: Sociological Support of Decision Making. Vlast’ (The Authority), 24(6), 107-115. Retrieved from https://jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/4324
Issue
Section
EXPERTISE
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
