The Phenomenon of Advocacy Networks and How it is Affected by the Development of Internet Technologies
How to Cite
Abdullaev R.A., Rykhtik M.I. The Phenomenon of Advocacy Networks and How it is Affected by the Development of Internet Technologies. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2015. Vol. 22. No. 6. P. 15-20.
Abstract
The article considers the phenomenon of origin and functioning of advocacy networks and its assessments existing in contemporary political science. The article`s goal is verifying the truth of hypothesis that NGO plays a key role as mediator between local and international level of participation inside those networks on the example of Russian nongovernmental organizations. This article analyzes the relationship between the development of transnational support and online networks across Europe
Keywords:
non-governmental organizations, networks in international politics, Internet in politics, Internet technologies, new mass media, political participation, civil society
References
Baluev D.G., Kaminchenko D.I. 2012. Faktor «novyh» sredstv massovoj informacii v formirovanii sovremennogo politicheskogo individa. – Sovremennye issledovaniya social'nyh problem, № 1. P. 266-269.
Carothers T. 2000. Civil Society. – Foreign Policy, № 177. P. 14-19.
Cohen J.L., Arato A. 1997. Civil Society and Political Theory. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dalton R.J., Kuechler M. 1990. Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies. Cambridge: Politie.
Eigen P. 2003. Das nets der corruption. Wie eine welrweite bewegung gegen bestechung kampft. Frankfurt; New York: Campus verlag.
Elections in the Age of the Internet: Lessons from the United States (S. Coleman, ed.). 2001.London: Hansard Society.
Henderson S.L. 2003. Building democracy in contemporary Russia: Western support for grassroots organizations. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, P.278.
Keck M.E., Sikkink K. 1998а. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Inthaca, N.Y.; London: Cornell University Press.
Keck M.E., Sikkink K. 1998б. Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Movement Society – The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Р. 217-238.
Kopecky P. 2003. Civil Society, Uncivil Society and Contentious Politics in Post-communist Europe. London: Routlege.
Mendelson S.E., Glenn J.K. 2002. The Power and Limits of NGOs: a Critical Look at Building Democracy in Eastern Europe and Eurasia. New York: Columbia University Press.
Risse Т., Ropp S.С. 1999. International Human Rights Norms and Domestic Changes: conclusion. – The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Changes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Risse Т., Sikkink К. 1999. The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: introduction. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Changes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Risse T. 2000. The Power of Norms vs. Norms of Power: Transnational Civil Society and Human Right. The Third Force: the Rise of Transnational Civil Society. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Take I. 2000. The Better Half of World Society – Civilizing World Politics: Society and Community beyond the State. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Р. 199-214.
Taubman J. 1998. A not so World Wide web: the Internet, China and the Challenges to Nondemocratic Rule. – Political communications, № 15. P. 255-272.
Touraine A. 1988. Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minesota Press.
Watson P., Barber B.R. 2000. The Struggle for Democracy. Toronto, Ontario: Key Porter book.
Wilhelm A.G. 2000. Democracy in a Digital Age. London: Routlege.
Carothers T. 2000. Civil Society. – Foreign Policy, № 177. P. 14-19.
Cohen J.L., Arato A. 1997. Civil Society and Political Theory. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dalton R.J., Kuechler M. 1990. Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies. Cambridge: Politie.
Eigen P. 2003. Das nets der corruption. Wie eine welrweite bewegung gegen bestechung kampft. Frankfurt; New York: Campus verlag.
Elections in the Age of the Internet: Lessons from the United States (S. Coleman, ed.). 2001.London: Hansard Society.
Henderson S.L. 2003. Building democracy in contemporary Russia: Western support for grassroots organizations. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, P.278.
Keck M.E., Sikkink K. 1998а. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Inthaca, N.Y.; London: Cornell University Press.
Keck M.E., Sikkink K. 1998б. Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Movement Society – The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Р. 217-238.
Kopecky P. 2003. Civil Society, Uncivil Society and Contentious Politics in Post-communist Europe. London: Routlege.
Mendelson S.E., Glenn J.K. 2002. The Power and Limits of NGOs: a Critical Look at Building Democracy in Eastern Europe and Eurasia. New York: Columbia University Press.
Risse Т., Ropp S.С. 1999. International Human Rights Norms and Domestic Changes: conclusion. – The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Changes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Risse Т., Sikkink К. 1999. The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: introduction. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Changes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Risse T. 2000. The Power of Norms vs. Norms of Power: Transnational Civil Society and Human Right. The Third Force: the Rise of Transnational Civil Society. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Take I. 2000. The Better Half of World Society – Civilizing World Politics: Society and Community beyond the State. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Р. 199-214.
Taubman J. 1998. A not so World Wide web: the Internet, China and the Challenges to Nondemocratic Rule. – Political communications, № 15. P. 255-272.
Touraine A. 1988. Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minesota Press.
Watson P., Barber B.R. 2000. The Struggle for Democracy. Toronto, Ontario: Key Porter book.
Wilhelm A.G. 2000. Democracy in a Digital Age. London: Routlege.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Abdullaev, R. A., & Rykhtik, M. I. (2015). The Phenomenon of Advocacy Networks and How it is Affected by the Development of Internet Technologies. Vlast’ (The Authority), 22(6), 15-20. Retrieved from https://jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/2499
Issue
Section
COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
