Legal Conflicts in Municipal Authority: Juridical Consequence of Political Practices

  • Lira Il'dusovna Gazizova gazizova-lira@mail.ru
How to Cite
Gazizova L.I. Legal Conflicts in Municipal Authority: Juridical Consequence of Political Practices. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2015. Vol. 22. No. 5. P. 123-129.

Abstract

The genesis of the modern Russian local government and municipal authority should be considered in conjunction with the features of the political and transformation processes that occurred in the post-Soviet space. They have caused controversy in the development of the legal framework of local government and municipal authority. These contradictions at different stages were characterized by trying to legalize their fundamentally different models, often having nothing in common with the actual state of affairs and historical traditions. Legal collisions in the sphere of the municipal authority became a legal consequence of political practices. Specialists are constantly working to identify and overcome conflicts in the area of local government. However, to prevent their reappearance it is necessary to reach a common vision of the development of municipal authority and local government.
Keywords:
municipal authority, local government, political practices, legal conflicts

References

Barabashev G.V. 1991. Sovet i mehr v «upryazhke» samoupravleniya. – Narodnyj deputat, № 11. P. 36-40.



Gimaev I.R., Dorozhkin Y.N., Podovzhnyaya G.G. 2002. Mestnaya vlast' v sovremennoj Rossii: problemy samoupravleniya i demokratii. M.: Paleotip, 160 p.



Gel'man V.Y. 2010. Politicheskie aspekty reformy mestnogo samoupravleniya. – Istoriya novoj Rossii. URL: http://www.ru-90.ru (accessed 18.04.2012).



Dement'ev A.N. 2005. Novaya reforma mestnoj vlasti: istoriya i voprosy realizacii. – Municipal'noe pravo, № 1. P. 80-88.



Kartashov V.G. 2008. Pravovoj mekhanizm razresheniya kollizij v sfere mestnogo samoupravleniya: avtoref. dis. … k.yu.n. M., 26 p.



Kovalev V.A. 2005. Rossijskaya municipal'naya reforma: beskonechnyj tupik? – Politehks. Vyp.3. P. 90-101.



Matveev M.N. 2009. Problema vstraivaemosti mestnogo samoupravleniya v gosudarstvennuyu vertikal'. Pravovoj i istoricheskij aspekty. – Yurist Povolzh'ya, № 11-12. P. 33-36.



Orlov D. 2005. Mestnoe samoupravlenie – put' v nikuda. – Internet protiv teleehkrana. 12 maya. Razgranichenie polnomochij mezhdu urovnyami vlasti: parlamentskie slushaniya v Gosdume Rossii. 2012. – Municipal'naya vlast', maj-iyun'. P. 16-22.



Starodubceva I.A. 2013. Kollizionnyj monitoring v mekhanizme vyyavleniya yuridicheskih kollizij. – Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, № 11. P. 41-45.



Tambovcev V. 2005. Resursy i nacionalizm. – Vedomosti, 8 dek.



Trofimova I.N. 2011. Institucional'noe razvitie mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossijskoj Federacii: avtoref. dis. … d.polit.n. M., 40 p.



Shirokov A. 2011. Tendencii razvitiya mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossii v kontekste zakonodatel'nyh izmenenij. – Municipal'naya vlast', № 6. P. 56-60
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Gazizova, L. I. (2015). Legal Conflicts in Municipal Authority: Juridical Consequence of Political Practices. Vlast’ (The Authority), 22(5), 123-129. Retrieved from https://jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/2448
Section
LAW