Media Framing as the Key Discursive Strategy
How to Cite
Ponomarev N.F. Media Framing as the Key Discursive Strategy. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2015. Vol. 21. No. 9. P. 93-98.
Abstract
The article substantiates political expediency and cognitive adequacy of media framing as the key discursive strategy used by political actors in order to control citizens’ perception and interpretation of political phenomena.
Keywords:
media framing, political discourse, public opinion, agenda setting, media relations, narrative framing
References
Luman N. Real'nost' massmedia. – M., 2005, p. 229.
Rusakova O.F., Rusakov V.M. PR-diskurs: teoretiko-metodologicheskij analiz. – Ekaterinburg, 2008, p. 5.
Foucault M. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. – N.Y. : Pantheon, 1980, p. 93.
Dijk T.A., van. Elite Discourse and Racism. – Newbury Park, 1993, p. 254.
Gavra D.P. Obshchestvennoe mnenie i vlast': rezhimy i mekhanizmy vzaimodejstviya // Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii, 1998, Vol. 1, vyp. 4; URL:http://www.old.jourssa.ru/1998/4/gavra.html
Fuchs D., Pfetsch B. The Observation of Public Opinion by the Governmental System. Discussion paper FS III 96–105 (December 1996).– Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin f r Sozialforschung GmbH, p. 10–11.
Entman R.M., Herbst S. Reframing Public Opinion as We Have Known It // Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy / eds. W.L. Bennett, R.M. Entman – N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 208.
Riker W.H. The Art of Political Manipulation. – N.Y. : Yale University Press, 1986.
Schattschneider E.E. The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. – Belmont : Wadsworth Publishing, 1975, p. 68.
Wodak R., Meyer M. Critical Discourse Analysis: History,Agenda,Theory, andMethodology // Methods for critical discourse analysis / ed. by R. Wodak, M. Meyer. – London : Sage, 2009, p. 1–33.
Campbell K.K. The Rhetorical Act. – Belmont : Wadsworth, 1996, p. 3.
Eustis J.D. Agenda-setting: The Universal Service Case : Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in Environmental Design and Planning. – Blacksburg, Virginia, 2000, April 7.
Hall S., Critcher C., Jefferson T., Clarke J., Roberts B. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. – N.Y. : Holmes and Meier, 1978, p. 59.
Reich R.B. Policy Making in a Democracy // The Power of Public Ideas / ed. by R.B. Reich. – Cambridge : Ballinger, 1988, p. 5.
Hall S. The Rediscovery of Ideology: Return to the Repressed in Media Studies // Culture, Society and the Media / M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran, J. Woollacott, eds. – N.Y. : Methuen, 1982, p. 59–90.
Kepplinger H.M. Reciprocal Effects: Toward a Theory of Mass Media Effects on Decision Makers // The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2007, vol. 12(2), p. 14.
Hayes D. Does the Messenger Matter? Candidatemedia Agenda Convergence and Its Effects on Voter Issue Salience // Political Research Quarterly, 2008, vol. 61(1), p. 135.
Wolfsfeld G. Political Waves and Democratic Discourse: Terrorism Waves during the Oslo Peace Process // Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy / W.L. Bennett, R.M. Entman (eds). – N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 226–251.
Chilton P. Metaphor, Euphemism, and the Militarization of Language // Current Research on Peace and Violence, 1987, № 10, p. 7–19.
Downs A. Up and Down with Ecology : The «Issue-Attention Cycle» // Public Interest, 1972, № 28, p. 38–50.
Cobb R.W., Ross M.H. Agenda Setting and the Denial of Agenda Access: Key Concepts // Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial / R.W. Cobb, M.H. Cobb (eds). – Lawrence Erlbaum Associates : University Press of Kansas, 1997, p. 3–4.
Sniderman P.M., Bullock J. A Consistency Theory of Public Opinion and Political Choice:The Hypothesis of Menu Dependence // Studies in Public Opinion / W.E. Saris, P.M. Sniderman (eds). – Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2004, p. 337–358.
Bazerman M., Chugh D. Decisions without Blinders // Harvard Business Review, 2006, vol. 84(1), p. 88–97.
Simon H.A. Models of Man: Social and Rational.– N.Y. : Wiley, 1957.
Downs A. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy // The Journal of Political Economy, 1957, vol. 65(2), p. 135–150.
Fiske S.T., Taylor S.E. Social Cognition. – N.Y. : McGraw-Hill, 1991.
Delli Carpini M.X. Mediating Democratic Engagement: The Impact of Communications on Citizens› Involvement in Political and Civic Life // Handbook of Political Communication Research / ed. by L.L. Kaid. – Mahwah : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004, p. 395–434.
Popkin S.L. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. – Chicago: University of Chicago, 1994.
Rusakova O.F., Rusakov V.M. PR-diskurs: teoretiko-metodologicheskij analiz. – Ekaterinburg, 2008, p. 5.
Foucault M. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. – N.Y. : Pantheon, 1980, p. 93.
Dijk T.A., van. Elite Discourse and Racism. – Newbury Park, 1993, p. 254.
Gavra D.P. Obshchestvennoe mnenie i vlast': rezhimy i mekhanizmy vzaimodejstviya // Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii, 1998, Vol. 1, vyp. 4; URL:http://www.old.jourssa.ru/1998/4/gavra.html
Fuchs D., Pfetsch B. The Observation of Public Opinion by the Governmental System. Discussion paper FS III 96–105 (December 1996).– Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin f r Sozialforschung GmbH, p. 10–11.
Entman R.M., Herbst S. Reframing Public Opinion as We Have Known It // Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy / eds. W.L. Bennett, R.M. Entman – N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 208.
Riker W.H. The Art of Political Manipulation. – N.Y. : Yale University Press, 1986.
Schattschneider E.E. The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. – Belmont : Wadsworth Publishing, 1975, p. 68.
Wodak R., Meyer M. Critical Discourse Analysis: History,Agenda,Theory, andMethodology // Methods for critical discourse analysis / ed. by R. Wodak, M. Meyer. – London : Sage, 2009, p. 1–33.
Campbell K.K. The Rhetorical Act. – Belmont : Wadsworth, 1996, p. 3.
Eustis J.D. Agenda-setting: The Universal Service Case : Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in Environmental Design and Planning. – Blacksburg, Virginia, 2000, April 7.
Hall S., Critcher C., Jefferson T., Clarke J., Roberts B. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. – N.Y. : Holmes and Meier, 1978, p. 59.
Reich R.B. Policy Making in a Democracy // The Power of Public Ideas / ed. by R.B. Reich. – Cambridge : Ballinger, 1988, p. 5.
Hall S. The Rediscovery of Ideology: Return to the Repressed in Media Studies // Culture, Society and the Media / M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran, J. Woollacott, eds. – N.Y. : Methuen, 1982, p. 59–90.
Kepplinger H.M. Reciprocal Effects: Toward a Theory of Mass Media Effects on Decision Makers // The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2007, vol. 12(2), p. 14.
Hayes D. Does the Messenger Matter? Candidatemedia Agenda Convergence and Its Effects on Voter Issue Salience // Political Research Quarterly, 2008, vol. 61(1), p. 135.
Wolfsfeld G. Political Waves and Democratic Discourse: Terrorism Waves during the Oslo Peace Process // Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy / W.L. Bennett, R.M. Entman (eds). – N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 226–251.
Chilton P. Metaphor, Euphemism, and the Militarization of Language // Current Research on Peace and Violence, 1987, № 10, p. 7–19.
Downs A. Up and Down with Ecology : The «Issue-Attention Cycle» // Public Interest, 1972, № 28, p. 38–50.
Cobb R.W., Ross M.H. Agenda Setting and the Denial of Agenda Access: Key Concepts // Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial / R.W. Cobb, M.H. Cobb (eds). – Lawrence Erlbaum Associates : University Press of Kansas, 1997, p. 3–4.
Sniderman P.M., Bullock J. A Consistency Theory of Public Opinion and Political Choice:The Hypothesis of Menu Dependence // Studies in Public Opinion / W.E. Saris, P.M. Sniderman (eds). – Princeton : Princeton University Press, 2004, p. 337–358.
Bazerman M., Chugh D. Decisions without Blinders // Harvard Business Review, 2006, vol. 84(1), p. 88–97.
Simon H.A. Models of Man: Social and Rational.– N.Y. : Wiley, 1957.
Downs A. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy // The Journal of Political Economy, 1957, vol. 65(2), p. 135–150.
Fiske S.T., Taylor S.E. Social Cognition. – N.Y. : McGraw-Hill, 1991.
Delli Carpini M.X. Mediating Democratic Engagement: The Impact of Communications on Citizens› Involvement in Political and Civic Life // Handbook of Political Communication Research / ed. by L.L. Kaid. – Mahwah : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004, p. 395–434.
Popkin S.L. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. – Chicago: University of Chicago, 1994.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Ponomarev, N. F. (2015). Media Framing as the Key Discursive Strategy. Vlast’ (The Authority), 21(9), 93-98. Retrieved from https://jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/2251
Issue
Section
COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
