Science as a Tool of Innovative Modernization of a Society
How to Cite
Konopkin A.M. Science as a Tool of Innovative Modernization of a Society. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2015. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 30-33.
Abstract
The article investigates the role of basic science in the emergence of innovation. The point of view that it has sense both the direct application of scientific discoveries for technological innovation and the metaphorical meaning of scientific theories and concepts that can be transferred to other problems is substantiated.
Keywords:
innovation, science, technical innovation, modernization
References
Demidova E., Rybkov A. Modernizaciya obrazovaniya ili obrazovanie dlya modernizacii? // Vlast', 2012, № 10, p. 96–99.
Zhabina V.Tvorchestvo i innovacionnaya deyatel'nost' // Vlast', 2012, № 9, p. 71.
Hippel E., von. The Sources of Innovation. – N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1988.
McKeown M.. The Truth about Innovation. – London, UK: Prentice Hall, 2008, p. 3.
Kryuchkova S.E. Tvorchestvo kak novacionnyj process. – M.: BFRGTZ «Slovo», 2007, p. 55.
Baranec N., Fedoseeva E. Ideologiya prodvizheniya innovacij v bogoslovii // Vlast', 2012, № 9, p. 89.
Gorohov V.G. Osnovy filosofii tekhniki i tekhnicheskih nauk : uchebnik. – M. : Gardariki, 2007, p. 152.
Gorohov V.G. Mesto i rol' filosofii tekhniki v sovremennoj filosofii // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 16. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki / otv. red. V.I. Arshinov, V.G. Gorohov. – M. IF RAN, 2011, p. 195.
Torukalo V. Nauka i vlast' v sovremennom obshchestve // Vlast', 2012, № 5, p. 75–76.
Deroshe P. Vozmozhna li novaya Kremnievaya dolina? // Kruglyj stol «polit.ru», 2011 // URL: www.polit.ru/article/2011/04/08/deroche (accessed 6.12.2012).
Tihonov A.A. Ontologicheskie aspekty innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti // Innovacionnyj potencial nauki. EHpistemologicheskij analiz. – M.: Kanon+, 2013, s. 28.
Bazhanov V.A., Vasil'eva O.A., Sivel'kina S.N. Metafora kak priznak i kriterij innovacii // Innovacionnyj potencial nauki. Ehpistemologicheskij analiz. M.: Kanon+, 2013, p. 123.
Zhabina V.Tvorchestvo i innovacionnaya deyatel'nost' // Vlast', 2012, № 9, p. 71.
Hippel E., von. The Sources of Innovation. – N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1988.
McKeown M.. The Truth about Innovation. – London, UK: Prentice Hall, 2008, p. 3.
Kryuchkova S.E. Tvorchestvo kak novacionnyj process. – M.: BFRGTZ «Slovo», 2007, p. 55.
Baranec N., Fedoseeva E. Ideologiya prodvizheniya innovacij v bogoslovii // Vlast', 2012, № 9, p. 89.
Gorohov V.G. Osnovy filosofii tekhniki i tekhnicheskih nauk : uchebnik. – M. : Gardariki, 2007, p. 152.
Gorohov V.G. Mesto i rol' filosofii tekhniki v sovremennoj filosofii // Filosofiya nauki. Vyp. 16. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki / otv. red. V.I. Arshinov, V.G. Gorohov. – M. IF RAN, 2011, p. 195.
Torukalo V. Nauka i vlast' v sovremennom obshchestve // Vlast', 2012, № 5, p. 75–76.
Deroshe P. Vozmozhna li novaya Kremnievaya dolina? // Kruglyj stol «polit.ru», 2011 // URL: www.polit.ru/article/2011/04/08/deroche (accessed 6.12.2012).
Tihonov A.A. Ontologicheskie aspekty innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti // Innovacionnyj potencial nauki. EHpistemologicheskij analiz. – M.: Kanon+, 2013, s. 28.
Bazhanov V.A., Vasil'eva O.A., Sivel'kina S.N. Metafora kak priznak i kriterij innovacii // Innovacionnyj potencial nauki. Ehpistemologicheskij analiz. M.: Kanon+, 2013, p. 123.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Konopkin, A. M. (2015). Science as a Tool of Innovative Modernization of a Society. Vlast’ (The Authority), 21(1), 30-33. Retrieved from https://jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/1573
Issue
Section
ARRANGEMENT OF RUSSIA: CHALLENGES AND RISKS
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
