Digital Communication at the Municipal Level of the Administrative Management: the Way to Involve Citizens in City Development
How to Cite
Lazaricheva E.S., Chukavin S.I. Digital Communication at the Municipal Level of the Administrative Management: the Way to Involve Citizens in City Development. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2015. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 60-66.
Abstract
The authors analyze digital communications initiated by the public authorities of Izhevsk. The aim of the article is to describe and evaluate current communication activity at the municipal level of the administrative management and to define the problem areas as well as opportunities for the further e-communications and e-participation development. The importance of the research is conditioned by the proceeding of the reform of the local self-governments and implementation of the federal program ・・Information Society (2011–2020)・・. The author notes the fact that official web-site of Izhevsk public authorities offers a very limited number of services that could potentially provide e-participation
Keywords:
e-participation, e-communications, web-site, blog, social networks, municipality, city development, Izhevsk
References
Lazaricheva E.S. 2013. Municipal'nyj uroven' ehlektronnoj demokratii: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty. – Vlast'. № 4. P. 39-43.
Leonova M.V. 2010. EHlektronnoe uchastie v Rossii i Evropejskom soyuze: strategii, mekhanizmy, ocenka rezul'tatov. – Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya. № 4. P. 124-135.
Anthopoulos L.G., Tougountzoglou T.E. 2012. A Viability Model for Digital Cities:Economic and Acceptability Factors. – Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. Political, Policy and Management Implications (ed. by C.G. Reddick, S.K. Aikins). N.Y.:Springer Science; Business Media. P. 79-96. Access: http://dde.teilar.gr/publications/187/anthopoulos_a_viability_model_for_digital_cities.pdf (checked 21.09.2014).
Macintosh A., Whyte A. 2008. Towards an Evaluation Framework for e-Participation. –Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. № 2(1). P. 16-30.
Osimo D. 2008. Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? Access: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=1565 (checked 21.09.2014).
Reddick G.C. 2011. Citizen Interaction and e-government: Evidence for the Managerial,Consultative and Participatory Models. – Transforming Government: People, Process and
Policy. No 5(2). P. 167-184.
Leonova M.V. 2010. EHlektronnoe uchastie v Rossii i Evropejskom soyuze: strategii, mekhanizmy, ocenka rezul'tatov. – Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya. № 4. P. 124-135.
Anthopoulos L.G., Tougountzoglou T.E. 2012. A Viability Model for Digital Cities:Economic and Acceptability Factors. – Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. Political, Policy and Management Implications (ed. by C.G. Reddick, S.K. Aikins). N.Y.:Springer Science; Business Media. P. 79-96. Access: http://dde.teilar.gr/publications/187/anthopoulos_a_viability_model_for_digital_cities.pdf (checked 21.09.2014).
Macintosh A., Whyte A. 2008. Towards an Evaluation Framework for e-Participation. –Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. № 2(1). P. 16-30.
Osimo D. 2008. Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? Access: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=1565 (checked 21.09.2014).
Reddick G.C. 2011. Citizen Interaction and e-government: Evidence for the Managerial,Consultative and Participatory Models. – Transforming Government: People, Process and
Policy. No 5(2). P. 167-184.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Lazaricheva, E. S., & Chukavin, S. I. (2015). Digital Communication at the Municipal Level of the Administrative Management: the Way to Involve Citizens in City Development. Vlast’ (The Authority), 23(1), 60-66. Retrieved from https://jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vlast/article/view/1523
Issue
Section
COMMUNICATION AND SOCIETY
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
