Эволюция критических исследований в области безопасности
Научная статья
Для цитирования
Хлопов О. А. Эволюция критических исследований в области безопасности // Власть. 2024. Том 32. № 3. С. 166-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/10.24412/2071-5358-2024-3-166-174
Аннотация
В статье представлены причины возникновения критических подходов к изучению проблем безопасности в области международных отношений. Автор дает краткий обзор ключевых подходов, точек зрения и концепций, которые составляют так называемые критические исследования в области безопасности (critical security studies) и выступают как академическая дисциплина и как научный подход в дискурсах по проблемам безопасности. Сформулированные новые концепции и идеи в рамках критических исследований на основе методологии социального конструктивизма расширили и углубили природу и масштаб ранее традиционного понимания безопасности, которое сводится только к защите государства от военных угроз. Благодаря новым взглядам на феномен безопасности работы ученых критических исследований заняли видное место в изучении проблем национальной и международной безопасности за последние десятилетия.
Ключевые слова:
международные отношения, безопасность, критические исследования, угрозы, конструктивизм, секьюритизация, идентичность
Литература
Booth K. 1991. Security and Emancipation. – Review of International Studies. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112033.
Booth K. 2007. Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 489 p.
Buzan B. 1983. People, States and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. University of North Carolina Press. 262 p.
Buzan B. 1991. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. 2nd ed. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 393 p.
Buzan B. 2003. Regional Security Complex Theory in the Post-Cold War World. Theories of New Regionalism. – Theories of New Regionalism. International Political Economy Series (ed. by F. Söderbaum, T.M. Shaw). London: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403938794_8.
Buzan B, Wæver O. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Society. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. 584 p.
Buzan B, Wæver P., de Wilde J. 1997. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishing. 239 p.
Campbell D. 1992. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 269 p.
Contemporary Security Studies. 2nd ed. (ed. by A. Collins). 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 510 р.
Critical Security Studies and World Politics (ed. by K. Booth). 2005. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685857356
Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (NED-New edition) (ed. by K. Krause, M.C. Willams). 1997. University of Minnesota Press. 408 p.
Krause K. 1998. Critical Theory and Security Studies: The Research Programme of «Critical Security Studies». – Cooperation and Conflict. Vol 33. No. 3. P. 298-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836798033003004.
Mathews J. T. 1989. Redefining Security. – Foreign Affairs. Vol. 68. No. 2. P. 162-177.
Milliken J. 2001. The Social Construction of the Korean War: Conflict and Its Possibilities. Manchester: University of Manchester Press. 258 p.
Mutimer D. 2016. Critical Security Studies?’ – Contemporary Security Studies. 4th ed. (ed. by A. Collins). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Price R. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 233 p.
Price R. 2004. Emerging Customary Norms and Anti-Personnel Landmines’. – The Politics of International Law (ed. by R. Price, C. Reus-Smit). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 106-130. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511491641.006.
Sylvester C. 1994. Feminist Theories and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 265 p.
Tannenwald N. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the NonUse of Nuclear Weapons since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannenwald N., Wohlforth W. 2005. Introduction: Ideas, International Relations and the End of the Cold War. – Journal of Cold War Studies. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1162/1520397053630574/
Ullman R. 1983. Redefining Security. – International Security. Vol. 8. No. 1, summer. P. 129-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2538489.
Walt S.M. 1991. The Renaissance of Security Studies. – International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 35. No. 2. June. P. 211-239.
Wendt A. 1992. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics. – International Organization. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. 391-425. DOI:10.1017/S0020818300027764.
Wendt A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 429 p.
Williams M.C. 1998. Identity and the Politics of Security. – European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 207-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135406619800400200.
Wyn Jones R. 1999. Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 191 p.
Booth K. 2007. Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 489 p.
Buzan B. 1983. People, States and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. University of North Carolina Press. 262 p.
Buzan B. 1991. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. 2nd ed. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 393 p.
Buzan B. 2003. Regional Security Complex Theory in the Post-Cold War World. Theories of New Regionalism. – Theories of New Regionalism. International Political Economy Series (ed. by F. Söderbaum, T.M. Shaw). London: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 140-159. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403938794_8.
Buzan B, Wæver O. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Society. Cambridge, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. 584 p.
Buzan B, Wæver P., de Wilde J. 1997. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishing. 239 p.
Campbell D. 1992. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 269 p.
Contemporary Security Studies. 2nd ed. (ed. by A. Collins). 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 510 р.
Critical Security Studies and World Politics (ed. by K. Booth). 2005. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685857356
Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (NED-New edition) (ed. by K. Krause, M.C. Willams). 1997. University of Minnesota Press. 408 p.
Krause K. 1998. Critical Theory and Security Studies: The Research Programme of «Critical Security Studies». – Cooperation and Conflict. Vol 33. No. 3. P. 298-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836798033003004.
Mathews J. T. 1989. Redefining Security. – Foreign Affairs. Vol. 68. No. 2. P. 162-177.
Milliken J. 2001. The Social Construction of the Korean War: Conflict and Its Possibilities. Manchester: University of Manchester Press. 258 p.
Mutimer D. 2016. Critical Security Studies?’ – Contemporary Security Studies. 4th ed. (ed. by A. Collins). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Price R. 1997. The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. 233 p.
Price R. 2004. Emerging Customary Norms and Anti-Personnel Landmines’. – The Politics of International Law (ed. by R. Price, C. Reus-Smit). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 106-130. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511491641.006.
Sylvester C. 1994. Feminist Theories and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 265 p.
Tannenwald N. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the NonUse of Nuclear Weapons since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannenwald N., Wohlforth W. 2005. Introduction: Ideas, International Relations and the End of the Cold War. – Journal of Cold War Studies. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1162/1520397053630574/
Ullman R. 1983. Redefining Security. – International Security. Vol. 8. No. 1, summer. P. 129-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2538489.
Walt S.M. 1991. The Renaissance of Security Studies. – International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 35. No. 2. June. P. 211-239.
Wendt A. 1992. Anarchy Is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics. – International Organization. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. 391-425. DOI:10.1017/S0020818300027764.
Wendt A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 429 p.
Williams M.C. 1998. Identity and the Politics of Security. – European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 207-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/135406619800400200.
Wyn Jones R. 1999. Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 191 p.
Статья
Поступила: 30.06.2024
Форматы цитирования
Другие форматы цитирования:
APA
Хлопов, О. А. (2024). Эволюция критических исследований в области безопасности. Власть, 32(3), 166-174. https://doi.org/10.24412/10.24412/2071-5358-2024-3-166-174
Выпуск
Раздел
ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ
Представляя в Редакцию рукопись автор выражает согласие со всеми пунктами настоящего лицензионного договора.
