Archaization as a phenomenon of systemic contradictions social development
Research Article
How to Cite
Komissarov S.N. Archaization as a phenomenon of systemic contradictions social development. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2022. Vol. 11. No. 6. P. 180-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2022.6.10 (in Russ.).
Abstract
Objective of the study is to analyze archaization as a phenomenon at the level of systemic contradictions of social development.
The methodological basis of the research. The author's approach is based on the theoretical and methodological provisions of the philosophical and sociological concept of transients by A. S. Akhiezer and the concept of C. K. Lamazhaa, which considers archaism in the context of system-wide structural changes, as well as the methodological basis of the author's approach was the system paradigm, the core of which is the principle of consistency.
Research results. The author's socio-philosophical reflection on the consideration of archaization as a phenomenon of systemic contradictions of social development has shown that, firstly, the origins of systemic contradictions lie in the course of transitivity and the revival of an archaic system of value-normative phenomena in a crisis situation; secondly, in the awakening of archaic memory; thirdly, in the generation of ideological illusions, as well as reproduction and strengthening of archaic social practices in conditions of systemic contradictions; finally, fourthly, in conditions of regression of transitivity, when we are dealing with the resuscitation of archaic structures.
Prospects of the study. Within the framework of a systematic approach to the conceptualization of archaization as a phenomenon of systemic contradictions, a socio-philosophical analysis of the influence of archaic processes on social practices in Russian society seems promising.
Keywords:
archaization, Russian society, archaic social practices, system, contradiction, social development
References
1. Antipyev A. G. (2010) “Archaic” Russian society and the problems of its modernization / A. G. Antipyev // Socio-humanitarian knowledge. – No. 6. – Pp. 3-13.
2. Akhiezer A. S. (2001) Archaization in Russian society as a methodological problem / A. S. Akhiezer // Social Sciences and modernity. – No. 2. – Pp. 89-100.
3. Akhiezer A. S. (2014) Trudy. M.: Novy chronograph, 2006. Pp. 98-112 / A. S. Akhiezer, Yu. N. Davydov // Sputnik of the yearbook “Russia reforming”: 1 CD ROM. Volume Issue 2014. – Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – P. 14.
4. Volkov Yu. G. (2020) Trauma Society: the search for a way of healing (invitation to discussion) / Yu. G. Volkov // Sociological research. – No. 9. – Pp. 16-27. – DOI 10.31857/S013216250009344-1.
5. Volkov Yu. G. (2022) Sociocultural traumas of modern Russian society / Yu. G. Volkov // Sociological research. – No. 3. – Pp. 13-23. – DOI 10.31857/S013216250017543-0.
6. Gezalov A. A. (2022) Globalization as a factor in the development of national cultures / A. A. Gezalov, S. N. Komissarov // SEARCH: Politics. Social studies. Art. Sociology. Culture. – No. 4(93). – Pp. 33-44.
7. Gishko V. Ya. (2013) The systemic nature of innovative processes of social institutions of modern Russian society / V. Ya. Gishko, O. V. Pridyba // Socio-humanitarian cognition in the context of philosophical innovation. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference / Scientific ed. A. M. Starostin. Rostov-on-Don. – Pp. 410-417.
8. Gorshkov M. K. (2022) At the turn of the century: sociodynamics of Russian culture / M. K. Gorshkov, S. N. Komissarov, O. I. Karpukhin. – Moscow: Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – 703 p. – ISBN 978-5-89697-390-4.
9. Ivanenko A. A. (2009) Social contradiction: features of structure and determination / A. A. Ivanenko, A. V. Lavrinenko, V. V. Popov // Philosophy of Law. – No. 4(35). – Pp. 105-109.
10. Kaluzhsky M. L. (2013) Methodological foundations of the analysis of systemic contradictions of social development / M. L. Kaluzhsky. – 2nd edition. – Moscow: Directmedia Publishing LLC. – 135 p. – ISBN 978-5-4458-2852-5. – DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.1342.9927.
11. Karpukhin O. I. (2019) Globalization as a “new cultural revolution” / O. I. Karpukhin, S. N. Komissarov // Socio-humanitarian knowledge. – No. 6. – Pp. 7-19.
12. Kasyanov V. V. (2020) Features and problems of social behavior in the conditions of self-isolation of the Russian population / V. V. Kasyanov, N. H. Gafiatulina, S. I. Samygin // Humanities of the South of Russia. – Vol. 9. – No. 2. – Pp. 51-63. – DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2020.2.3.
13. Koznova I. E. (2003) Historical memory and the main trends of its study / I. E. Koznova // Sociology of Power. – No. 2. – Pp. 23-34.
14. Koshelev M. I. (1999) Lawlessness: Philos.-transdisciplinary essay / M. I. Koshelev. – Moscow: Horizon. – 111 p. – ISBN 5-88236-064-1.
15. Lamazhaa C. K. O. (2011) Archaization of society in the period of social transformations / C. K. O. Lamazhaa // Knowledge. Understanding. Ability. – No. 3. – Pp. 35-42.
16. Moiseev A. V. (2013) Philosophy of the future as self-consciousness of the limit: paradoxes and contradictions / Socio-humanitarian cognition in the context of philosophical innovation. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference / Scientific ed. A. M. Starostin. Rostov-on-Don. – Pp. 137-146.
17. Music O. A. (2011) Axiological features of the system analysis of contradictions, crisis and transitional periods in the transformations of modern Russian society / O. A. Music // International Journal of Experimental Education. – No. 5. – Pp. 123-125.
18. Nikolaeva U. G. (2008) “Paradoxes” of transitivity: archaic features of the new Russian economy / U. G. Nikolaeva // Social Policy and Sociology. – No. 2. – Pp. 187-200.
19. Russian society in conditions of self-isolation. Social effects and consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) / N. H. Gafiatulina, V. V. Kasyanov, P. S. Samygin, S. I. Samygin. – Moscow: Rusains Limited Liability Company. – 178 p. – ISBN 978-5-4365-5741-0.
20. Sitnikov A. P. (2021) Archaization of social practices in the context of challenges and crises of modern Russian reality / A. P. Sitnikov // Humanities of the South of Russia. – Vol. 10. – No. 5. – Pp. 54-72. – DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2021.5.3.
21. Skvortsov N. G. (2022) Paradoxes of the transitive period: archaic features of modern Russian society / N. G. Skvortsov // Humanities of the South of Russia. – Vol. 11. – No. 4. – Pp. 65-74. – DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2022.4.4.
22. Shcherbakova L. I. (2017) Social health of Russian youth in the light of the theory of socio-cultural trauma / L. I. Shcherbakova, N. H. Gafiatulina, S. I. Samygin // Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences.– No. 6-7. – Pp. 90-96.
2. Akhiezer A. S. (2001) Archaization in Russian society as a methodological problem / A. S. Akhiezer // Social Sciences and modernity. – No. 2. – Pp. 89-100.
3. Akhiezer A. S. (2014) Trudy. M.: Novy chronograph, 2006. Pp. 98-112 / A. S. Akhiezer, Yu. N. Davydov // Sputnik of the yearbook “Russia reforming”: 1 CD ROM. Volume Issue 2014. – Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – P. 14.
4. Volkov Yu. G. (2020) Trauma Society: the search for a way of healing (invitation to discussion) / Yu. G. Volkov // Sociological research. – No. 9. – Pp. 16-27. – DOI 10.31857/S013216250009344-1.
5. Volkov Yu. G. (2022) Sociocultural traumas of modern Russian society / Yu. G. Volkov // Sociological research. – No. 3. – Pp. 13-23. – DOI 10.31857/S013216250017543-0.
6. Gezalov A. A. (2022) Globalization as a factor in the development of national cultures / A. A. Gezalov, S. N. Komissarov // SEARCH: Politics. Social studies. Art. Sociology. Culture. – No. 4(93). – Pp. 33-44.
7. Gishko V. Ya. (2013) The systemic nature of innovative processes of social institutions of modern Russian society / V. Ya. Gishko, O. V. Pridyba // Socio-humanitarian cognition in the context of philosophical innovation. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference / Scientific ed. A. M. Starostin. Rostov-on-Don. – Pp. 410-417.
8. Gorshkov M. K. (2022) At the turn of the century: sociodynamics of Russian culture / M. K. Gorshkov, S. N. Komissarov, O. I. Karpukhin. – Moscow: Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. – 703 p. – ISBN 978-5-89697-390-4.
9. Ivanenko A. A. (2009) Social contradiction: features of structure and determination / A. A. Ivanenko, A. V. Lavrinenko, V. V. Popov // Philosophy of Law. – No. 4(35). – Pp. 105-109.
10. Kaluzhsky M. L. (2013) Methodological foundations of the analysis of systemic contradictions of social development / M. L. Kaluzhsky. – 2nd edition. – Moscow: Directmedia Publishing LLC. – 135 p. – ISBN 978-5-4458-2852-5. – DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.1342.9927.
11. Karpukhin O. I. (2019) Globalization as a “new cultural revolution” / O. I. Karpukhin, S. N. Komissarov // Socio-humanitarian knowledge. – No. 6. – Pp. 7-19.
12. Kasyanov V. V. (2020) Features and problems of social behavior in the conditions of self-isolation of the Russian population / V. V. Kasyanov, N. H. Gafiatulina, S. I. Samygin // Humanities of the South of Russia. – Vol. 9. – No. 2. – Pp. 51-63. – DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2020.2.3.
13. Koznova I. E. (2003) Historical memory and the main trends of its study / I. E. Koznova // Sociology of Power. – No. 2. – Pp. 23-34.
14. Koshelev M. I. (1999) Lawlessness: Philos.-transdisciplinary essay / M. I. Koshelev. – Moscow: Horizon. – 111 p. – ISBN 5-88236-064-1.
15. Lamazhaa C. K. O. (2011) Archaization of society in the period of social transformations / C. K. O. Lamazhaa // Knowledge. Understanding. Ability. – No. 3. – Pp. 35-42.
16. Moiseev A. V. (2013) Philosophy of the future as self-consciousness of the limit: paradoxes and contradictions / Socio-humanitarian cognition in the context of philosophical innovation. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference / Scientific ed. A. M. Starostin. Rostov-on-Don. – Pp. 137-146.
17. Music O. A. (2011) Axiological features of the system analysis of contradictions, crisis and transitional periods in the transformations of modern Russian society / O. A. Music // International Journal of Experimental Education. – No. 5. – Pp. 123-125.
18. Nikolaeva U. G. (2008) “Paradoxes” of transitivity: archaic features of the new Russian economy / U. G. Nikolaeva // Social Policy and Sociology. – No. 2. – Pp. 187-200.
19. Russian society in conditions of self-isolation. Social effects and consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) / N. H. Gafiatulina, V. V. Kasyanov, P. S. Samygin, S. I. Samygin. – Moscow: Rusains Limited Liability Company. – 178 p. – ISBN 978-5-4365-5741-0.
20. Sitnikov A. P. (2021) Archaization of social practices in the context of challenges and crises of modern Russian reality / A. P. Sitnikov // Humanities of the South of Russia. – Vol. 10. – No. 5. – Pp. 54-72. – DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2021.5.3.
21. Skvortsov N. G. (2022) Paradoxes of the transitive period: archaic features of modern Russian society / N. G. Skvortsov // Humanities of the South of Russia. – Vol. 11. – No. 4. – Pp. 65-74. – DOI 10.18522/2227-8656.2022.4.4.
22. Shcherbakova L. I. (2017) Social health of Russian youth in the light of the theory of socio-cultural trauma / L. I. Shcherbakova, N. H. Gafiatulina, S. I. Samygin // Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences.– No. 6-7. – Pp. 90-96.
Article
Received: 25.10.2022
Accepted: 25.12.2022
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Komissarov, S. N. (2022). Archaization as a phenomenon of systemic contradictions social development. Humanities of the South of Russia, 11(6), 180-190. https://doi.org/10.18522/2227-8656.2022.6.10
Section
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY
