Empirical and Universal Subject in Humanitarian Cognition
How to Cite
Aliyev M.R. Empirical and Universal Subject in Humanitarian Cognition. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 82-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.4.9 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article analyzes the dynamics of cognition from empirical to universal, transcendental subject in relation to social and humanitarian knowledge. The subject metamorphoses in classical, non-classical science and culture, modern and postmodern are revealed. It is shown, that the classical knowledge of cognitive discourse returns to the empirical and the existential subject. However this is not a simple return to classical science, but a statement in the cognition of the integral subject, in the unity of the individual, universal, transcendental and existential.
Keywords:
subject of cognition, empirical subject, universal and transcendental subject, social and humanitarian knowledge
References
Apel', K.-O. (2001). The transformation of the philosophy. M.: Logos.
Bahtin, M.M. (2000). Author and hero: To the philosophical foundations of the Humanities. SPb.: Azbuka.
Mikeshina, L.A. (2006). The transcendental dimension of human knowledge. Voprosy filosofii, 1, 49-67. (in Russian).
Mikeshina, L.A. (2010). The empirical subject and the category of life. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 1, 5-15. (in Russian).
Lakan, Zh. (1999). "I" in Freud's theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis (1954/1955). Trans. from French A. Chernoglazov. M.: Gnozis.
Pankova, E.S. (2016). The crisis of the Cartesian paradigm of the subject as an "epistemic" shift. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya, 2 (26), 32-37. (in Russian).
Porus, V.N. (1999). "The end of the subject" or post-religious culture? Razum i ekzistenciya. SPb.
Fromm, E. (2010). To have or to be? Trans. from Germ. E.M. Telyatnikova. M.: AST: Astrel'.
Fuko, M. (1977). Words and things. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. M.: Progress.
Yaspers, K. (1991). Meaning and purpose of history. M.: Politicheskaya literatura.
Bahtin, M.M. (2000). Author and hero: To the philosophical foundations of the Humanities. SPb.: Azbuka.
Mikeshina, L.A. (2006). The transcendental dimension of human knowledge. Voprosy filosofii, 1, 49-67. (in Russian).
Mikeshina, L.A. (2010). The empirical subject and the category of life. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 1, 5-15. (in Russian).
Lakan, Zh. (1999). "I" in Freud's theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis (1954/1955). Trans. from French A. Chernoglazov. M.: Gnozis.
Pankova, E.S. (2016). The crisis of the Cartesian paradigm of the subject as an "epistemic" shift. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya, 2 (26), 32-37. (in Russian).
Porus, V.N. (1999). "The end of the subject" or post-religious culture? Razum i ekzistenciya. SPb.
Fromm, E. (2010). To have or to be? Trans. from Germ. E.M. Telyatnikova. M.: AST: Astrel'.
Fuko, M. (1977). Words and things. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. M.: Progress.
Yaspers, K. (1991). Meaning and purpose of history. M.: Politicheskaya literatura.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Aliyev, M. R. (2019). Empirical and Universal Subject in Humanitarian Cognition. Humanities of the South of Russia, 8(4), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.4.9
Section
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY
