The Dialogue about cognitive-developmental paradigm of Higner education
How to Cite
Gerasimov G.I., Lubsky A.V. The Dialogue about cognitive-developmental paradigm of Higner education. Humanities of the South of Russia. 2016. No. 2. P. 107-122. (in Russ.).
Abstract
By way of dialog mode the article touches upon the issues related to the necessity of transition to the cognitive-developmental paradigm of education, its features and capabilities as a way of cultural and educational space organization in higher education.
Keywords:
professional culture of a teacher, informational-knowledge paradigm of education, cognitive-developmental paradigm of education, cultural-educational space
References
Toffler A. Futuroshok. – SPb.: Lan’, 1997. S. 328.
Karnikau R., McElroy F. Communicationfor the safety professional. – Chicago, 1975.
Verbitskii A. A. Novaia obrazovatel’naia paradigma i kontekstnoe obuchenie. – M.: Issledovatel’skii tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 1999;Bondarevskaia E. V. Teoriia i praktika lichnostno-orientirovannogo obrazovaniia.Rostov n/D: RGPU, 2000; Verbitskii A. A., Larionova O. G. Lichnostnyi I kompetentnostnyi podkhody v obrazovanii: problemy integratsii. – M.: Logos, 2009.
Mamardashvili M. K. Lektsii o Pruste (psikhologicheskaia topologiia puti). – M.:Ad Marginem, 1995. – S. 13.
Pedagogicheskie tekhnologii distantsionnogo obucheniia: Ucheb.posobie dlia stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenii / [E. S. Polat, M. V. Moiseeva, A. E. Petrovi dr.] M.: Izdatel’skii tsentr «Akademiia»,2006.
Bueva L. Chelovek, kul’tura i obrazovanie v krizisnom sotsiume // Alma mater. – 1997.№ 4. – S. 16.
Brooks J. & Brooks M. In search of understanding: The case of constructivist classrooms. – Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,1999.
Berezhnova L. N. Obrazovaniekak mnogoaspektnyi sotsiokul’turnyi fenomen // Chelovek i obrazovanie vsovremennoi Rossii: sotsiologiches-kieocherki. – SPb.: Izd-vo S-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 1998. – S. 182.
Karnikau R., McElroy F. Communicationfor the safety professional. – Chicago, 1975.
Verbitskii A. A. Novaia obrazovatel’naia paradigma i kontekstnoe obuchenie. – M.: Issledovatel’skii tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 1999;Bondarevskaia E. V. Teoriia i praktika lichnostno-orientirovannogo obrazovaniia.Rostov n/D: RGPU, 2000; Verbitskii A. A., Larionova O. G. Lichnostnyi I kompetentnostnyi podkhody v obrazovanii: problemy integratsii. – M.: Logos, 2009.
Mamardashvili M. K. Lektsii o Pruste (psikhologicheskaia topologiia puti). – M.:Ad Marginem, 1995. – S. 13.
Pedagogicheskie tekhnologii distantsionnogo obucheniia: Ucheb.posobie dlia stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenii / [E. S. Polat, M. V. Moiseeva, A. E. Petrovi dr.] M.: Izdatel’skii tsentr «Akademiia»,2006.
Bueva L. Chelovek, kul’tura i obrazovanie v krizisnom sotsiume // Alma mater. – 1997.№ 4. – S. 16.
Brooks J. & Brooks M. In search of understanding: The case of constructivist classrooms. – Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,1999.
Berezhnova L. N. Obrazovaniekak mnogoaspektnyi sotsiokul’turnyi fenomen // Chelovek i obrazovanie vsovremennoi Rossii: sotsiologiches-kieocherki. – SPb.: Izd-vo S-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 1998. – S. 182.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Gerasimov, G. I., & Lubsky, A. V. (2016). The Dialogue about cognitive-developmental paradigm of Higner education. Humanities of the South of Russia, (2), 107-122. Retrieved from https://jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/hsr/article/view/3604
Section
HIGHER EDUCATION: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
