Social Integration of Migrants from Central Asia and other post-Soviet States (Comparative Study)
Research Article
Acknowledgments
The article was prepared with the support of the Programme of fundamental and applied scientific research “Ethnocultural diversity of Russian society and strengthening of the All-Russian identity”.
How to Cite
Tolmacheva A.Y. 2021. Social Integration of Migrants from Central Asia and other post-Soviet States (Comparative Study) — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 238-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.3.8444
Abstract
The article examines the relationship between migrants to Russia and the host society, using surveys taken in the spring of 2017 and in the autumn of 2020. According to German-speaking authors, social integration is one of the stages of forming comprehensive integration of foreigners. Public opinion surveys show that migrants from Central Asia are the most undesirable for Russians. That is why the article gives comparative study of social integration of immigrants from Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan compared to other post-Soviet states (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Ukraine). The central focus is given to migrants’ self-perception of their place in the Russian society and to evaluation of quality of interpersonal interaction with the citizens.
The results obtained from the study show that migrants from Central Asia are the least integrated into the host society and more oriented towards the sending state compared to migrants from other countries. Also, despite reasonable Russian language proficiency, migrants from Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan communicate with the representatives of their own ethnos in every aspect of their lives more often than migrants from other Soviet republics. At the same time, they identify themselves with the citizens of Russia less frequently.
The reason for such low social integration of Central Asian migrants compared to other migrant groups could be their desire to return to their homeland and that they may view migration to Russia just as a way of survival in the unfavourable conditions in their country of origin.
Keywords:
migrants, work migrants from Central Asia, social integration, interethnic relations, host society
References
1. Brusina O. (2008). Migranty iz Srednei Azii v Rossii: etapy i prichiny priezda, sotsial’nye tipy, organizatsii diaspor. [Migrants from Central Asia in Russia: stages and reasons of arrival, social types, organizations of diasporas]. Vestnik Evrazii. № 2. P. 66–95. (In Russ.).
2. Mukomel’ V. I. (2016). Adaptatsiya i integratsiya migrantov: metodologicheskie podkhody k otsenke rezul’tativnosti i rol’ prinimayushhego obshhestva. [Adaptation and integration of migrants: methodological approaches to performance assessment and the role of the host society]. Rossiya reformiruyushhayasya : ezhegodnik / otv. red. M. K. Gorshkov ; Institut sotsiologii RAN. Moskva : Novyi khronograf, Vyp. 14. S. 411–467. (In Russ.).
3. Mukomel’ V. I. (2020). Vysokokvalifitsirovannye migranty iz postsovetskikh gosudarstv: trudovaya mobil’nost’. [Highly qualified migrants from post-Soviet states: labor mobility]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. № 2. S. 31–59. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2020.26.2.7264 (In Russ.).
4. Mukomel’ V. I. (2017). Migranty na rossiiskom rynke truda: zanyatost’, mobil’nost’, intensivnost’ i oplata truda. [Migrants in the Russian labor market: employment, mobility, intensity and remuneration]. Statistika i Ekonomika. № 6. S. 69–79. DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2017-6-69-79 (In Russ.).
5. Mukomel’ V. I. (2018). Regional’nye osobennosti integratsii vnutrirossiiskikh inoetnichnykh migrantov. [Regional features of integration of intra-Russian non-ethnic migrants]. Federalizm. № 2 (90). S. 141–160. (In Russ.).
6. Mukomel’ V. I., Ryzova S. V. (2017). Doverie i nedoverie v mezhnatsional’nykh otnosheniyakh. [Trust and distrust in interethnic relations]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 1 (393). S. 37–46.
7. Esser H. Integration und ethnische Schichtung. Mannheim : Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, 2001.
8. Heckmann F. Integration and integration policies: IMISCOE network feasibility study. Bamberg : Europäisches forum für migrationsstudien (efms) Institut an der Universität Bamberg. 2006. 277 р. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-192953 (дата обращения: 14.09.2021).
9. Siegert M. Die sozialen Kontakte Geflüchteter. Ausgabe 04|2019 der urzanalysen des Forschungszentrums Migration, Integration und Asyl des Bundesamtes für Migration und Flüchtlinge. Nürnberg, 2019. 12 p.
10. Siegert M. Die sozialen Kontakte Geflüchteter. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge, 2019.
2. Mukomel’ V. I. (2016). Adaptatsiya i integratsiya migrantov: metodologicheskie podkhody k otsenke rezul’tativnosti i rol’ prinimayushhego obshhestva. [Adaptation and integration of migrants: methodological approaches to performance assessment and the role of the host society]. Rossiya reformiruyushhayasya : ezhegodnik / otv. red. M. K. Gorshkov ; Institut sotsiologii RAN. Moskva : Novyi khronograf, Vyp. 14. S. 411–467. (In Russ.).
3. Mukomel’ V. I. (2020). Vysokokvalifitsirovannye migranty iz postsovetskikh gosudarstv: trudovaya mobil’nost’. [Highly qualified migrants from post-Soviet states: labor mobility]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. № 2. S. 31–59. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2020.26.2.7264 (In Russ.).
4. Mukomel’ V. I. (2017). Migranty na rossiiskom rynke truda: zanyatost’, mobil’nost’, intensivnost’ i oplata truda. [Migrants in the Russian labor market: employment, mobility, intensity and remuneration]. Statistika i Ekonomika. № 6. S. 69–79. DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2017-6-69-79 (In Russ.).
5. Mukomel’ V. I. (2018). Regional’nye osobennosti integratsii vnutrirossiiskikh inoetnichnykh migrantov. [Regional features of integration of intra-Russian non-ethnic migrants]. Federalizm. № 2 (90). S. 141–160. (In Russ.).
6. Mukomel’ V. I., Ryzova S. V. (2017). Doverie i nedoverie v mezhnatsional’nykh otnosheniyakh. [Trust and distrust in interethnic relations]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 1 (393). S. 37–46.
7. Esser H. Integration und ethnische Schichtung. Mannheim : Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, 2001.
8. Heckmann F. Integration and integration policies: IMISCOE network feasibility study. Bamberg : Europäisches forum für migrationsstudien (efms) Institut an der Universität Bamberg. 2006. 277 р. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-192953 (дата обращения: 14.09.2021).
9. Siegert M. Die sozialen Kontakte Geflüchteter. Ausgabe 04|2019 der urzanalysen des Forschungszentrums Migration, Integration und Asyl des Bundesamtes für Migration und Flüchtlinge. Nürnberg, 2019. 12 p.
10. Siegert M. Die sozialen Kontakte Geflüchteter. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge, 2019.
Article
Received: 10.06.2021
Accepted: 28.09.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Tolmacheva, A. Y. (2021) ’Social Integration of Migrants from Central Asia and other post-Soviet States (Comparative Study)’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 9(3), pp. 238-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.3.8444.
Section
ETHNOSOCIOLOGY
Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)