Results of Monitoring the Process of Informatization During the Socio-Digital Transformation of the Regional Administration
Research Article
How to Cite
Bogdanov V.S. 2021. Results of Monitoring the Process of Informatization During the Socio-Digital Transformation of the Regional Administration — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 88-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.3.8435
Abstract
We continue to observe how the intensification of technological modernization contributes to the reproduction of new phenomena with subsequent centaur problems at the intersection of social relations and infocommunicative practices. Such spontaneous processes with a high degree of uncertainty pose new challenges to sociology and the sociology of management, in particular, to their study, reflection and interpretation both in theory and in the practice of everyday life. Among them, we include the process of socio-digital transformation in society and the sphere of management, which has recently been updated as a result of the widespread use of information and communication technologies in traditional social management practices.
This article proposes to get acquainted with the results of a long-term study of this phenomenon in the context of studying the domestic management system through the attitude of the population to the functioning of the prevailing model of power-management vertical in the country. The research was initiated in 2016 at the Center of Sociology and Social Technologies of the IS RAS (hand. A.V. Tikhonov) still has the status of monitoring. As part of the operationalization of concepts, a definition of electronic management in a broad and narrow sense, its role and place in solving socially significant problems of regions and information technology modernization of territories has been developed and presented.
Based on the testing of indices for measuring the state and development of socio-digital transformation of regional management systems, as part of an online examination of the functioning of regional management systems in 7 regions, the author’s interpretation of the contours of infosocial modernization of management in Russian regions is presented. Conclusions were drawn on the dominance of the subjects of government, determining the nature and course of infosocial modernization.
Keywords:
social and digital transformation, informatization of regional government, electronic control, electronic government, sociocultural modernization, infosoсial modernization of management
References
1. Atlas modernizatsii Rossii i ee regionov: sotsioekonomicheskie i sotsiokul’turnye tendentsii i problem. (2016). [Atlas of modernization of Russia and its regions: socio-economic and socio-cultural trends and problems]. Ed. by. chlen-korr. RAN N. I. Lapin. M. : Ves’ Mir publ. 360 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bogdanov V. S. (2018). Informatizaciya regionalnogo upravleniya: problemyi perspektivy. [Informatization of regional governance: challenges and perspectives]. Vestnik Instituta sotziologii. № 25. P. 27–47. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2018.25.2.507 (In Russ.).
3. Bogdanov V. S., Smirnova A. S. (2020). Problema sotsiologicheskogo izmereniya sotsialno-setevogo gruppoobrazovaniya v usloviyakh realizastii natsionalnykh proektov. [Problem of sociological in measuring social-network grouping in conditions of implementation of national projects]. Nauchnyj rezultat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie. № 4. P. 146–168. DOI 10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-4-0-9 (In Russ.).
4. Ivanov D. V. (2020). Dopolnennaya sovremennost: effekty postglobalizatsii i postvirtualizatsii. [Augmented modernity: Post-globalization and postvirtualization effects]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. № 5. P. 44–55. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009397-9 (In Russ.).
5. Kravchenko S. A. (2019). Mnogolikost metamorfoz: o novaciyakh dvukh kanadskikh sotsiologov. [The many faces of metamorphoses: about innovations of two canadian sociologists]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 2. P. 26–35. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003999 (In Russ.).
6. Konvergenciya biologicheskix, informacionnyx, nano- i kognitivnyx texnologij: vyzov filosofii (materialy kruglogo stola). (2013). [Convergence of biological, information, nano- and cognitive technologies: challenging philosophy (round table materials)]. Voprosy philosophii. URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=644 (data obrashheniya: 24.01.2021). (In Russ.).
7. Nurmuxametova M. I., Pavlova G. G. (2020). Problema Informatsionnoj otkrytosti organov munitsipalnoj vlasti na primere sajtov administratsij gorodov Chelyabinska i Magnitogorska. [The problem of information openness of municipal authorities on the example of sites of the administrations of the cities of Chelyabinsk and Magnitogorsk]. Obshhestvo, ekonomika, upravlenie. № 1. P. 24–29. DOI: 10.24411/2618-2020-15104 (In Russ.).
8. Obzor gosudarstvennoj politiki razvitiya IKT (2002). Finalnyj otchet. Novaya ekonomika. Fond ekonom. issled. URL: http://refdb.ru/look/2785229-pall.html (data obrashheniya: 24.01.2021). (In Russ.).
9. Rossiya: reformirovanie vlastno-upravlencheskoy vertikali v kontekste problem sotsiokul’turnoy modernizatsii regionov. (2017). [Russia: reforming the power-management vertical in the context of sociocultural modernization of regions]. Ed. by A. V. Tikhonov. M. : FCTAS RAS publ. 432 p. (In Russ.).
10. Savelzon O. (2005). Svoboda vybora i protsedurnaya ratsionalnost. [Freedom of choice and procedural rationality]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. № 1. P. 109–121. (In Russ.).
11. Tazhitdinov I. A., Ataeva A. G., Shatunova A. I. (2020). Transparentnost’ organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v usloviyakh tsifrovoj ekonomiki. [Transparency of local governments in the digital economy]. Munitsipalitet: ekonomika i upravlenie. № 3 (32). P. 48–58. (In Russ.).
12. Tikhonov A. V. (2018). Sotsiologiya upravleniya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra (materialy kruglogo stola). [Sociology of management: yesterday, today, tomorrow (round table materials)]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 2. P. 102–113. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518020113 (In Russ.).
13. Tikhonov A. V., Bogdanov V. S. (2020). Ot «umnogo regulirovaniya» k «umnomu upravleniyu»: socialnaya problema cifrovizacii obratnyx svyazej. [From «smart regulation» to «smart management»: social issue of feedback digitalization]. Sotsciologicheskie issledovaniya. № 1. P. 74–81. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008325-0 (In Russ.).
14. Tezaurus sotsiologii: tematicheskij slova-spravochnik (2009). [Thesaurus of Sociology : thematic dictionary-directory]. Ed. by. Zh. T. Toschenko. M. : YuNITI-DANA publ. 487 p. (In Russ.).
15. Xarari Yu. N. (2018). Homo Deus: Kratkaya istoriya zavtrashnego dnya. [Homo Deus: a brief history of tomorrow]. M. : Sindbad publ. 496 p. (In Russ.).
16. Shabrov O. F. (2003). Kompyuterizatsiya. [Сomputerization]. Ed. by. V. N. Ivanov. Sotsiol. enciklopediya: v 2 t. T. 1. M. : Mysl’ publ. P. 462–464. (In Russ.).
17. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. NSF/DOC-sponsored report (2003). Ed. by M. Roco and W. Bainbridge. Dordrecht : Kluwer Acad. Publ.
18. Janis I., Mann L. (1977). Decision Making. New York: The Free Press, 488 p.
19. Istvan Z. Should a Transhumanist Run for US President? The Huffington Post. URL: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/should-a-transhumanist-be_b_5949688 (date of access: 14.09.2021).
20. Kurzweil R. (2005). The Singularity is Near. New York : Viking Books. 432 p
21. Mosco V. (2017). Becoming Digital. Toward a Post-Internet Society. Bingley : Emerald Publishing Limited.
22. Schwab K., Malleret T. (2020). COVID–19 : The Great Reset. Forum Publishing, 280 p.
23. Simon H. (1976). From Substantive to Procedural Rationality. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge. P. 129–148.
24. Vanderburg W. H. (2016). Our Battle for the Human Spirit. Toronto: University of Toronto Press,
25. What is Good Governance? United Nation Escap. URL: http://www.unescap.org/huset/gg/governance.htm (date of access: 14.09.2021)
2. Bogdanov V. S. (2018). Informatizaciya regionalnogo upravleniya: problemyi perspektivy. [Informatization of regional governance: challenges and perspectives]. Vestnik Instituta sotziologii. № 25. P. 27–47. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2018.25.2.507 (In Russ.).
3. Bogdanov V. S., Smirnova A. S. (2020). Problema sotsiologicheskogo izmereniya sotsialno-setevogo gruppoobrazovaniya v usloviyakh realizastii natsionalnykh proektov. [Problem of sociological in measuring social-network grouping in conditions of implementation of national projects]. Nauchnyj rezultat. Sotsiologiya i upravlenie. № 4. P. 146–168. DOI 10.18413/2408-9338-2020-6-4-0-9 (In Russ.).
4. Ivanov D. V. (2020). Dopolnennaya sovremennost: effekty postglobalizatsii i postvirtualizatsii. [Augmented modernity: Post-globalization and postvirtualization effects]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. № 5. P. 44–55. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009397-9 (In Russ.).
5. Kravchenko S. A. (2019). Mnogolikost metamorfoz: o novaciyakh dvukh kanadskikh sotsiologov. [The many faces of metamorphoses: about innovations of two canadian sociologists]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 2. P. 26–35. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003999 (In Russ.).
6. Konvergenciya biologicheskix, informacionnyx, nano- i kognitivnyx texnologij: vyzov filosofii (materialy kruglogo stola). (2013). [Convergence of biological, information, nano- and cognitive technologies: challenging philosophy (round table materials)]. Voprosy philosophii. URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=644 (data obrashheniya: 24.01.2021). (In Russ.).
7. Nurmuxametova M. I., Pavlova G. G. (2020). Problema Informatsionnoj otkrytosti organov munitsipalnoj vlasti na primere sajtov administratsij gorodov Chelyabinska i Magnitogorska. [The problem of information openness of municipal authorities on the example of sites of the administrations of the cities of Chelyabinsk and Magnitogorsk]. Obshhestvo, ekonomika, upravlenie. № 1. P. 24–29. DOI: 10.24411/2618-2020-15104 (In Russ.).
8. Obzor gosudarstvennoj politiki razvitiya IKT (2002). Finalnyj otchet. Novaya ekonomika. Fond ekonom. issled. URL: http://refdb.ru/look/2785229-pall.html (data obrashheniya: 24.01.2021). (In Russ.).
9. Rossiya: reformirovanie vlastno-upravlencheskoy vertikali v kontekste problem sotsiokul’turnoy modernizatsii regionov. (2017). [Russia: reforming the power-management vertical in the context of sociocultural modernization of regions]. Ed. by A. V. Tikhonov. M. : FCTAS RAS publ. 432 p. (In Russ.).
10. Savelzon O. (2005). Svoboda vybora i protsedurnaya ratsionalnost. [Freedom of choice and procedural rationality]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. № 1. P. 109–121. (In Russ.).
11. Tazhitdinov I. A., Ataeva A. G., Shatunova A. I. (2020). Transparentnost’ organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v usloviyakh tsifrovoj ekonomiki. [Transparency of local governments in the digital economy]. Munitsipalitet: ekonomika i upravlenie. № 3 (32). P. 48–58. (In Russ.).
12. Tikhonov A. V. (2018). Sotsiologiya upravleniya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra (materialy kruglogo stola). [Sociology of management: yesterday, today, tomorrow (round table materials)]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 2. P. 102–113. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518020113 (In Russ.).
13. Tikhonov A. V., Bogdanov V. S. (2020). Ot «umnogo regulirovaniya» k «umnomu upravleniyu»: socialnaya problema cifrovizacii obratnyx svyazej. [From «smart regulation» to «smart management»: social issue of feedback digitalization]. Sotsciologicheskie issledovaniya. № 1. P. 74–81. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008325-0 (In Russ.).
14. Tezaurus sotsiologii: tematicheskij slova-spravochnik (2009). [Thesaurus of Sociology : thematic dictionary-directory]. Ed. by. Zh. T. Toschenko. M. : YuNITI-DANA publ. 487 p. (In Russ.).
15. Xarari Yu. N. (2018). Homo Deus: Kratkaya istoriya zavtrashnego dnya. [Homo Deus: a brief history of tomorrow]. M. : Sindbad publ. 496 p. (In Russ.).
16. Shabrov O. F. (2003). Kompyuterizatsiya. [Сomputerization]. Ed. by. V. N. Ivanov. Sotsiol. enciklopediya: v 2 t. T. 1. M. : Mysl’ publ. P. 462–464. (In Russ.).
17. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. NSF/DOC-sponsored report (2003). Ed. by M. Roco and W. Bainbridge. Dordrecht : Kluwer Acad. Publ.
18. Janis I., Mann L. (1977). Decision Making. New York: The Free Press, 488 p.
19. Istvan Z. Should a Transhumanist Run for US President? The Huffington Post. URL: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/should-a-transhumanist-be_b_5949688 (date of access: 14.09.2021).
20. Kurzweil R. (2005). The Singularity is Near. New York : Viking Books. 432 p
21. Mosco V. (2017). Becoming Digital. Toward a Post-Internet Society. Bingley : Emerald Publishing Limited.
22. Schwab K., Malleret T. (2020). COVID–19 : The Great Reset. Forum Publishing, 280 p.
23. Simon H. (1976). From Substantive to Procedural Rationality. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge. P. 129–148.
24. Vanderburg W. H. (2016). Our Battle for the Human Spirit. Toronto: University of Toronto Press,
25. What is Good Governance? United Nation Escap. URL: http://www.unescap.org/huset/gg/governance.htm (date of access: 14.09.2021)
Article
Received: 02.06.2021
Accepted: 28.09.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Bogdanov, V. S. (2021) ’Results of Monitoring the Process of Informatization During the Socio-Digital Transformation of the Regional Administration’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 9(3), pp. 88-106. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.3.8435.
Section
SOCIOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT
Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)