Social and Professional Adaptation: From Conceptualization To Measurement
Research Article
How to Cite
Pinchuk A.N. 2021. Social and Professional Adaptation: From Conceptualization To Measurement — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 96-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.2.8107
Abstract
The article deals with the need to analyze social and professional adaptation under digital transformation in the labour market and the renewal of various professional activities resulted in developing new technology. The first part of the article considers the conceptual approaches to understanding the features of social and professional adaptation as an independent phenomenon, which have required the integration of conceptual developments in various branches of socio-humanitarian knowledge: sociology of adaptation, sociology of professions and social psychology. Based on the conceptual ideas presented, there defined social and professional adaptation, which is the inclusion of an actor in his profession through the formation of professional identity within the development of a professional role. This definition contains references to reconciling the internal needs of an actor in his professional self-realization and requiring the professional environment, which enunciates the interaction among the parties of adaptive relations in their professional sphere. Taking into account the adaptation situation, the features of social and professional adaptation are locally and globally analyzed and a clarification is made in the interpretation of «labour adaptation», which is similar in its content. The second part of the work enunciates the subjective and objective indicators of social and professional adaptation in the context of structural operationalization, which allows us to empirically study this phenomenon. The subjective indicators of social and professional adaptation are distinguished on the basis of an interpretive approach, according to which the effectiveness of adaptation should be studied through the self-assessment of an adaptor’s satisfaction with various aspects of his professional self-realization. The objective criteria of social and professional adaptation indentify the behavioural performance of an adaptation actor, which can acquire active and passive forms. The article introduces the general characteristics of methodological approaches to the analysis of social and professional adaptation in quantitative and qualitative research. The results are planned to be used in the future for a sociological study based on the developed conceptual and methodological framework.
Keywords:
social adaptation, profession, social and professional adaptation, subjective indicators of social and professional adaptation, objective indicators of social and professional adaptation
References
1. Avraamova E. M. (2018). Rossijskoe naselenie v postsovetskij period: opyt krizisov i sotsial’nye resursy razvitiya. [The Russian population in the post-soviet period: experience of crises and social resources of development]. M.: Izdatel’skij dom «Delo» RANHiGS publ. 208 p. (In Russ.).
2. Avraamova E. M., Loginov D. L. (2018). Adaptatsiya naseleniya k «novoj ekonomicheskoj real’nosti» [The population’s adaptation to the new economic reality]. Vserossijskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal «EKO». № 6. P. 86–102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2018-6-86-102. (In Russ.).
3. Anderson B. (2016). Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva: razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. [Imagined communities. reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism]. M.: Kuchkovo pole publ. 416 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bezjuljova G. V. (2008). Psihologo-pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie professional’noj adaptatsii uchashhihsja i studentov. [Psychological and pedagogical support of professional adaptation of students]. M.: NOU VPO Moskovskij psihologo-social’nyj institute publ. 320 p. (in Russ.).
5. Gotlib A. S. (2000). Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaja adaptatsija rossijan: opyt sochetanija kolichestvennoj i kachestvennoj metodologii v odnom otdel’no vzjatom issledovanii. [Socio-economic adaptation of Russians: experience of combining quantitative and qualitative methodology in a single study]. Sotsiologija: metodologija, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie (4M). № 12. P. 5–24. (in Russ.).
6. Karavay A. V. (2019). Osnovnye modeli sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoj adaptatsii v raznykh stratakh rossijskogo obshchestva. [Basic models of socio-economic adaptation in different strata of Russian society]. Terra Economicus. № 17 (3). P. 128–145. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-3-128-145. (in Russ.).
7. Kapelyushnikov R. I. (2017). Tekhnologicheskij progress – pozhiratel’ rabochih mest? [Is technological change a devourer of jobs?]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. № 11. P. 111–140. https://doi. org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-11-111-140. (In Russ.).
8. Kozyreva P. M. (2004). Processy adaptatsii i e’volyutsiya sotsial’nogo samochuvstviya rossiyan na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov. [Adaptation processes and evolution of social well–being of Russians at the turn of XX-XXI centuries]. M.: Centr obshhechelovecheskikh cennostej publ. 320 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kozyreva P. M., Nizamova A. E., Smirnov A. I. (2013). Resursy i praktiki sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoj adaptatsii naseleniya Rossii. [Resources and practices of socio-economic adaptation of the Russian population.]. M. : Novyj khronograf publ. 328 p. (In Russ.).
10. Korel L. V. (2005). Sotsiologija adaptatsij: Voprosy teorii, metodologii i metodiki [Sociology of adaptations: questions of theory, methodology and methodology]. Novosibirsk: Nauka publ. 424 p. (in Russ.).
11. Lukov V. A. (2018). Tezaurusnaya sotsiologiya. [Thesaurus cociology]: in 4 volumes. M.: Moscow Publishing House. humanit. un-ta. Vol. 1. 608 p. (in Russ.).
12. Luneva O. V. (2018). Adaptatsiya sotsial’naya. [Social adaptation]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. № 3. P. 240–245. (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2018.3.22. (in Russ.).
13. Mamikonyan M. S. (2019). Problema trudovoj adaptatsii rossijskoj molodezhi (po materialam glubinnykh interv’yu). [The Problem of labor adaptation of Russian youth (Based on in-depth interviews)]. Informatsionno-analiticheskij byulleten’. INAB. № 4. Sotsial’naya adaptatsiya molodezhi na rynke truda. P. 39–47. DOI: 10.19181/ inab.2019.4.3. (in Russ.).
14. Massovaya unikal’nost’ – global’nyj vyzov v bor’be za talanty. [Massive uniqueness is a global challenge in the struggle for talent]. (2019). Boston Consulting Group. Rosatom, WorldSkills Russia. URL: https://web-assets.bcg.com/f9/24/5f3a82564d6fa0d27a6d767ae0f6/rus-bcg-mas-uniqtcm27-228998.pdf (In Russ.). (data obraschenija: 12.01.2021).
15. Merton R. (2006). Sotsial’naia teoriia i sotsial’naia struktura. [Social theory and social structure]. M.: AST Moskva publ.; Khranitel’ publ. 873 p. (In Russ.).
16. Parshina T. O. (2008). Strukturnaya model’ sotsial’no-psihologicheskoj adaptatsii cheloveka. [Structural model of socio-psychological adaptation of the person]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. №8. P. 100–106. (In Russ.).
17. Pasovec YU. M. (2015). Adaptirovannost’ naseleniya k sotsial’nym izmeneniyam i ee pokazateli. [Population’s adaptedness to the social changes and its indicators]. Izvestiya vuzov. SeveroKavkazskij region. Obshchestvennye nauki. № 1. P. 28–35. (In Russ.).
18. Pinchuk A. N. (2020). Obrazovatel’nye praktiki v mekhanizmah adaptatsii k tsifrovym transformatsiyam: kontseptual’nye idei i metodologicheskie podhody. [Educational practices in mechanisms of adaptation to digital transformations: conceptual ideas and methodological approaches]. Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znanija. № 1. P. 95–114. URL: http://journals.mosgu.ru/ggz/article/ view/1165 DOI: 10.17805/ggz.2020.1.7 (In Russ.).
19. Posypanov O. G. (2002). Metodika izmereniya sotsial’noj adaptivnosti lichnosti. [Methodology for measuring the social adaptability of the individual]. Sovremennaya psihologiya: Sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanij: CHast’ 2: Obshchaya i sotsial’naya psihologiya, psihologiya lichnosti i psihofiziologiya, ekonomicheskaya, organizacionnaya i politicheskaya psihologiya: Ed. by A. L. ZHuravlev. M. : Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN» publ. P. 93–112. (In Russ.).
20. Romanov P. V., Yarskaya-Smirnova E. R. (2015). Sotsiologija professij: analiticheskie perspektivy i metodologija issledovanij. (Biblioteka ZHurnala issledovanij sotsial’noj politiki). [Sociology of professions: analytical perspectives and research methodology. (library of the journal of social policy research)]. M.: Variant publ. 234 p. (In Russ.).
21. Romashova L. O. (2016). Spetsifika trudovoj adaptatsii rossijskoj molodezhi. [Labor market adaptation of Russia’s youth: specific features]. Nauchnye trudy moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. № 5. P. 34–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17805/trudy.2016.5.4. (In Russ.).
22. Romm M. V. (2002). Adaptatsiya lichnosti v sotsiume: Teoretiko-metodologicheskij aspekt. [Adaptation of the individual in society: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Novosibirsk: Nauka publ. 275 p. (In Russ.).
23. Rossiya 2025: ot kadrov k talantam. (2017). [Russia 2025: from cadres to talents]. The Boston Consulting Group. URL: https://www.bcg.com/ru-ru/perspectives/188095 (data obraschenija: 12.01.2021). (in Russ.).
24. Saks M. (2020). Neoveberianizm i professii. [Neo-weberianism and the professions]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 6. P. 28–41. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009646-3. (in Russ.).
25. Smoleva E. O. (2019). Kriterii i resursy sotsial’noj adaptatsii naseleniya Rossii. [Criteria and resources for social adaptation of Russia’s population]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. Vol. 12, № 2. P. 179–195. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.11. (in Russ.).
26. Sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya. (2003). [Sociological Encyclopedia]. Vol. 2. Head of the Scientific Project Semigin G. YU.; Ed. by Ivanov V. N. M.: Mysl’ publ. 863 p. (In Russ.).
27. Tikhonova N. E., Karavaj A. V. (2016). Resursy rossiyan v usloviyah krizisa: dinamika i rol’ v adaptatsii k novym usloviyam. [Resources of Russians in times of crisis: dynamics and role in adaptation to new conditions]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 10. P. 43–53. (In Russ.).
28. Fromm E. (2004). Begstvo ot svobody. CHelovek dlya samogo sebya. [Escape from freedom. man for himself]. M.: Klinika glubinnoj psihologii prof. P. S. Gurevicha publ. 399 p. (In Russ.).
29. CHto takoe tsifrovaya ekonomika? Trendy, kompetentsii, izmerenie. (2019). [What is the digital economy? trends, competencies, measurement]. M.: Izdatel’skii dom NIU VShE publ. 82 p. (In Russ.).
30. Schwab K. (2019). CHetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. [The fourth industrial revolution]. M.: Eksmo publ. 288 p. (In Russ.).
31. Shchepanskaya T. B. (2010). Sravnitel’naja jetnografija professij: povsednevnye praktiki i kul’turnye kody (Rossija, konec XX — nachalo XXI v.). [Comparative ethnography of professions: everyday practices and cultural codes (russia, end of the 20th — early 21st century)]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka publ. 338 p. (In Russ.).
32. Arntz M., Gregory T., Zierahn U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no 189, Paris. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en.
33. Autor D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of work-place automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 29, № 3. P. 3–30. doi=10.1257/jep.29.3.3.
34. Gajda J. (2019). Professional adaptation of new employees to the organization. System Safety: Human – Technical Facility – Environment. CzOTO. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 929–938.
35. Ibarra H. (1999). Provisional selves: experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 764–791.
36. Kergroach S. (2017). Industry 4.0: new challenges and opportunities for the labour market. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 11, № 4. P.6–8. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.6.8.
37. Krause I. (2019). Coworking space: a window to the future of work? Foresight and STI Governance. Vol.13, № 2. P. 52–60. DOI: 10.17323/2500- 2597.2019.2.52.60.
38. Kristof-Brown A. E., Zimmerman R. D., Johnson E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual’s fit at work: a meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology. Vol. 58, № 2. P. 281–342.
39. Seidl da Fonseca R. (2017). The future of employment: evaluating the impact of sti foresight exercises. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 11, № 4. P. 9–22. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.4.9.22.
40. Van Dam K. (2013). Employee adaptability to change at work: a multidimensional, resource-based framework. In S. Oreg, A. Michel, & R. By (Eds.). The Psychology of Organizational Change: Viewing Change from the Employee’s Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 123–142. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139096690.009
2. Avraamova E. M., Loginov D. L. (2018). Adaptatsiya naseleniya k «novoj ekonomicheskoj real’nosti» [The population’s adaptation to the new economic reality]. Vserossijskij ekonomicheskij zhurnal «EKO». № 6. P. 86–102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2018-6-86-102. (In Russ.).
3. Anderson B. (2016). Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva: razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. [Imagined communities. reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism]. M.: Kuchkovo pole publ. 416 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bezjuljova G. V. (2008). Psihologo-pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie professional’noj adaptatsii uchashhihsja i studentov. [Psychological and pedagogical support of professional adaptation of students]. M.: NOU VPO Moskovskij psihologo-social’nyj institute publ. 320 p. (in Russ.).
5. Gotlib A. S. (2000). Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaja adaptatsija rossijan: opyt sochetanija kolichestvennoj i kachestvennoj metodologii v odnom otdel’no vzjatom issledovanii. [Socio-economic adaptation of Russians: experience of combining quantitative and qualitative methodology in a single study]. Sotsiologija: metodologija, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie (4M). № 12. P. 5–24. (in Russ.).
6. Karavay A. V. (2019). Osnovnye modeli sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoj adaptatsii v raznykh stratakh rossijskogo obshchestva. [Basic models of socio-economic adaptation in different strata of Russian society]. Terra Economicus. № 17 (3). P. 128–145. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-3-128-145. (in Russ.).
7. Kapelyushnikov R. I. (2017). Tekhnologicheskij progress – pozhiratel’ rabochih mest? [Is technological change a devourer of jobs?]. Voprosy Ekonomiki. № 11. P. 111–140. https://doi. org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-11-111-140. (In Russ.).
8. Kozyreva P. M. (2004). Processy adaptatsii i e’volyutsiya sotsial’nogo samochuvstviya rossiyan na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov. [Adaptation processes and evolution of social well–being of Russians at the turn of XX-XXI centuries]. M.: Centr obshhechelovecheskikh cennostej publ. 320 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kozyreva P. M., Nizamova A. E., Smirnov A. I. (2013). Resursy i praktiki sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoj adaptatsii naseleniya Rossii. [Resources and practices of socio-economic adaptation of the Russian population.]. M. : Novyj khronograf publ. 328 p. (In Russ.).
10. Korel L. V. (2005). Sotsiologija adaptatsij: Voprosy teorii, metodologii i metodiki [Sociology of adaptations: questions of theory, methodology and methodology]. Novosibirsk: Nauka publ. 424 p. (in Russ.).
11. Lukov V. A. (2018). Tezaurusnaya sotsiologiya. [Thesaurus cociology]: in 4 volumes. M.: Moscow Publishing House. humanit. un-ta. Vol. 1. 608 p. (in Russ.).
12. Luneva O. V. (2018). Adaptatsiya sotsial’naya. [Social adaptation]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. № 3. P. 240–245. (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2018.3.22. (in Russ.).
13. Mamikonyan M. S. (2019). Problema trudovoj adaptatsii rossijskoj molodezhi (po materialam glubinnykh interv’yu). [The Problem of labor adaptation of Russian youth (Based on in-depth interviews)]. Informatsionno-analiticheskij byulleten’. INAB. № 4. Sotsial’naya adaptatsiya molodezhi na rynke truda. P. 39–47. DOI: 10.19181/ inab.2019.4.3. (in Russ.).
14. Massovaya unikal’nost’ – global’nyj vyzov v bor’be za talanty. [Massive uniqueness is a global challenge in the struggle for talent]. (2019). Boston Consulting Group. Rosatom, WorldSkills Russia. URL: https://web-assets.bcg.com/f9/24/5f3a82564d6fa0d27a6d767ae0f6/rus-bcg-mas-uniqtcm27-228998.pdf (In Russ.). (data obraschenija: 12.01.2021).
15. Merton R. (2006). Sotsial’naia teoriia i sotsial’naia struktura. [Social theory and social structure]. M.: AST Moskva publ.; Khranitel’ publ. 873 p. (In Russ.).
16. Parshina T. O. (2008). Strukturnaya model’ sotsial’no-psihologicheskoj adaptatsii cheloveka. [Structural model of socio-psychological adaptation of the person]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. №8. P. 100–106. (In Russ.).
17. Pasovec YU. M. (2015). Adaptirovannost’ naseleniya k sotsial’nym izmeneniyam i ee pokazateli. [Population’s adaptedness to the social changes and its indicators]. Izvestiya vuzov. SeveroKavkazskij region. Obshchestvennye nauki. № 1. P. 28–35. (In Russ.).
18. Pinchuk A. N. (2020). Obrazovatel’nye praktiki v mekhanizmah adaptatsii k tsifrovym transformatsiyam: kontseptual’nye idei i metodologicheskie podhody. [Educational practices in mechanisms of adaptation to digital transformations: conceptual ideas and methodological approaches]. Gorizonty gumanitarnogo znanija. № 1. P. 95–114. URL: http://journals.mosgu.ru/ggz/article/ view/1165 DOI: 10.17805/ggz.2020.1.7 (In Russ.).
19. Posypanov O. G. (2002). Metodika izmereniya sotsial’noj adaptivnosti lichnosti. [Methodology for measuring the social adaptability of the individual]. Sovremennaya psihologiya: Sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanij: CHast’ 2: Obshchaya i sotsial’naya psihologiya, psihologiya lichnosti i psihofiziologiya, ekonomicheskaya, organizacionnaya i politicheskaya psihologiya: Ed. by A. L. ZHuravlev. M. : Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN» publ. P. 93–112. (In Russ.).
20. Romanov P. V., Yarskaya-Smirnova E. R. (2015). Sotsiologija professij: analiticheskie perspektivy i metodologija issledovanij. (Biblioteka ZHurnala issledovanij sotsial’noj politiki). [Sociology of professions: analytical perspectives and research methodology. (library of the journal of social policy research)]. M.: Variant publ. 234 p. (In Russ.).
21. Romashova L. O. (2016). Spetsifika trudovoj adaptatsii rossijskoj molodezhi. [Labor market adaptation of Russia’s youth: specific features]. Nauchnye trudy moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. № 5. P. 34–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17805/trudy.2016.5.4. (In Russ.).
22. Romm M. V. (2002). Adaptatsiya lichnosti v sotsiume: Teoretiko-metodologicheskij aspekt. [Adaptation of the individual in society: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Novosibirsk: Nauka publ. 275 p. (In Russ.).
23. Rossiya 2025: ot kadrov k talantam. (2017). [Russia 2025: from cadres to talents]. The Boston Consulting Group. URL: https://www.bcg.com/ru-ru/perspectives/188095 (data obraschenija: 12.01.2021). (in Russ.).
24. Saks M. (2020). Neoveberianizm i professii. [Neo-weberianism and the professions]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 6. P. 28–41. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009646-3. (in Russ.).
25. Smoleva E. O. (2019). Kriterii i resursy sotsial’noj adaptatsii naseleniya Rossii. [Criteria and resources for social adaptation of Russia’s population]. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. Vol. 12, № 2. P. 179–195. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.11. (in Russ.).
26. Sotsiologicheskaya entsiklopediya. (2003). [Sociological Encyclopedia]. Vol. 2. Head of the Scientific Project Semigin G. YU.; Ed. by Ivanov V. N. M.: Mysl’ publ. 863 p. (In Russ.).
27. Tikhonova N. E., Karavaj A. V. (2016). Resursy rossiyan v usloviyah krizisa: dinamika i rol’ v adaptatsii k novym usloviyam. [Resources of Russians in times of crisis: dynamics and role in adaptation to new conditions]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 10. P. 43–53. (In Russ.).
28. Fromm E. (2004). Begstvo ot svobody. CHelovek dlya samogo sebya. [Escape from freedom. man for himself]. M.: Klinika glubinnoj psihologii prof. P. S. Gurevicha publ. 399 p. (In Russ.).
29. CHto takoe tsifrovaya ekonomika? Trendy, kompetentsii, izmerenie. (2019). [What is the digital economy? trends, competencies, measurement]. M.: Izdatel’skii dom NIU VShE publ. 82 p. (In Russ.).
30. Schwab K. (2019). CHetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. [The fourth industrial revolution]. M.: Eksmo publ. 288 p. (In Russ.).
31. Shchepanskaya T. B. (2010). Sravnitel’naja jetnografija professij: povsednevnye praktiki i kul’turnye kody (Rossija, konec XX — nachalo XXI v.). [Comparative ethnography of professions: everyday practices and cultural codes (russia, end of the 20th — early 21st century)]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka publ. 338 p. (In Russ.).
32. Arntz M., Gregory T., Zierahn U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no 189, Paris. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en.
33. Autor D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of work-place automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 29, № 3. P. 3–30. doi=10.1257/jep.29.3.3.
34. Gajda J. (2019). Professional adaptation of new employees to the organization. System Safety: Human – Technical Facility – Environment. CzOTO. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 929–938.
35. Ibarra H. (1999). Provisional selves: experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 764–791.
36. Kergroach S. (2017). Industry 4.0: new challenges and opportunities for the labour market. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 11, № 4. P.6–8. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2017.4.6.8.
37. Krause I. (2019). Coworking space: a window to the future of work? Foresight and STI Governance. Vol.13, № 2. P. 52–60. DOI: 10.17323/2500- 2597.2019.2.52.60.
38. Kristof-Brown A. E., Zimmerman R. D., Johnson E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual’s fit at work: a meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology. Vol. 58, № 2. P. 281–342.
39. Seidl da Fonseca R. (2017). The future of employment: evaluating the impact of sti foresight exercises. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 11, № 4. P. 9–22. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.4.9.22.
40. Van Dam K. (2013). Employee adaptability to change at work: a multidimensional, resource-based framework. In S. Oreg, A. Michel, & R. By (Eds.). The Psychology of Organizational Change: Viewing Change from the Employee’s Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 123–142. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139096690.009
Article
Received: 02.02.2021
Accepted: 30.06.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
Harvard
Pinchuk, A. N. (2021) ’Social and Professional Adaptation: From Conceptualization To Measurement’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 9(2), pp. 96-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2021.9.2.8107.
Section
SOCIOLOGY OF PROFESSIONS
Publisher: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)