Socio-Psychological Resources of the Development of Society in Digital Technology

Research Article
How to Cite
Zhuravlev A.L., Kitova D.A. 2020. Socio-Psychological Resources of the Development of Society in Digital Technology — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 24-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.2.7301

Abstract

Russia occupies a leading position in the world ranking of countries with the richest natural resources, but lags behind many countries of the world in terms of living standards. Studies of Russian sociologists also suggest that, according to Russians, negative dynamics are manifested in many indicators characterizing the main areas of life of Russian society. To overcome this situation, a close study of the laws of functioning and the cyclical stages of social processes is necessary, which is impossible without reliance on socio-psychological knowledge, which is increasingly being integrated into international models for assessing the quality of life at the macro, meso- and micro- levels. Recent studies convincingly demonstrate the relationship of psychological factors with the quality of life of society, there is a realization that these factors can serve as important levers in optimizing socio-economic processes, can increase their productivity and are effective in implementing public administration programs. In modern conditions, no scientific field can give a complete answer to the question about the nature of the factors (legal, economic, social, psychological, etc.) that determine an increase in the standard of living of the population and ensure the stability of its social development. Accordingly, the optimization of the social sphere is a complex interdisciplinary problem, which, in one of its manifestations, is associated with the need to identify various historical and everyday cycles that affect the effectiveness of economic and political processes, as well as the mindset of the population. In this direction, the development of information technology creates serious opportunities for combining the efforts of representatives of the humanities, social and technical sciences, and the organization of large-scale integrated research.
Keywords:
socio-economic development, standard of living, subjective well-being, digitalization of science, socio-psychological technologies, psychological mechanisms, machine learning, emotional analysis, interdisciplinary research

Author Biographies

Anatoly L. Zhuravlev, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Scientific Director
Dzhuletta A. Kitova, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher

References

Avdeev S. P. (2005). Znanie v svyazyah social’nosti. [Knowledge in social relations]. M.: Logos publ., 270 p. (In Russ.).

Aprelikova N. R., Kitova D. A. (2018). Struktura potrebnostej studencheskoj molodyozhi v znaniyah po psihologii. [The structure of the needs of students for knowledge in psychology]. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social’naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya. T. 4. № 2(14). Р. 110–133. (In Russ.).

Fukuyama F. (2004). Doverie: sotsial’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k protsvetaniyu. [Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity]. M.: AST, Ermak publ., 730 p. (In Russ.).

Gorshkov M. K. (2013). Neekonomicheskie faktory ekonomicheskogo rosta: neispol’zovannye rezervy. [Non-Economic Growth Factors: Unused Reserves]. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. № 2(10). Р. 33–43. (In Russ.).

Dejneka O. S. (2000). Ekonomicheskaya psihologiya: Uchebnoe posobie. [Economic Psychology: Textbook]. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta. 160 p. (In Russ.).

I vnov’ na pereput’e? Postsovetskim transformatsiyam 30 let… [And again at a crossroads? PostSoviet transformations 30 years...]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov i G. A. Tosunyan. M.: Novye pechatnye tekhnologii publ., 2019. 382 p. (In Russ.).

Indeksy i indikatory chelovecheskogo razvitiya. [Indices and indicators of human development]. URL: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_ statistical_u pdate_ru.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.08.2019). (In Russ.).

Kitova D. A. (2005). Material’noe samoobespechenie lichnosti kak predmet psihologicheskogo issledovaniya. [Material self-sufficiency of personality as a subject of psychological research]. Problemy ekonomicheskoj psihologii. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN». P. 577–601. (In Russ.).

Kitova D. A. (2012). Ekonomicheskaya psihologiya sub”ekta zhiznedeyatel’nosti: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika. [Economic psychology of the subject of life: theory, methodology, practice]. Ekonomicheskaya psihologiya v sovremennom mire: Sb. nauch. Statej. Otv. red. A. N. Lebedev. M.: Ekon-inform publ., P. 148–161. (In Russ.).

Kitova D. A., Zhuravlev A. L. (2020). Psihologicheskie osobennosti otnosheniya k detyam pol’zovatelej social’noj seti Twitter. [Psychological features of the attitude of children of the users of the social network Twitter]. Institut psikhologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya. T. 5. № 1(17). Р. 33–72. (In Russ.).

Makropsihologiya sovremennogo rossijskogo obshchestva. [Macropsychology of modern Russian society]. (2009). Ed. by A. L. Zhuravleva, A. V. Yurevicha. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN» publ., 352 p. (In Russ.).

Massovoe soznanie i povedenie: tendencii sotsial’no-psihologicheskih issledovanij. (2017). [Mass consciousness and behavior: trends in socio-psychological research]. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN» publ., 424 p. (In Russ.).

Rejting stran mira po urovnyu ekonomicheskoj svobody: informatsiya ob issledovanii. [Rating of countries in terms of economic freedom: study information]. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/ index-of-economic-freedom/index-of-economic-freedom-info (data obrashcheniya: 17.09.2019). (In Russ.).

Rejting schast’ya po stranam. Vsemirnyj doklad o schast’e 2018. [Happiness rating by country. World Happiness Report 2018]. URL: https://theworldonly.org/tag/indeks-schastya/ (data obrashcheniya: 14.09.2019). (In Russ.).

Savchenko D. V. (2014). Sotsial’nye gruppy v strukture obshchestva: teoreticheskie koncepcii i upravlencheskie modeli. [Social groups in the structure of society: theoretical concepts and managerial models]. Obshchestvo i pravo. № 3(49). Р. 292–296. (In Russ.).

Vorob’yova A. E., Akbarova A. A. (2019). Sotsial’no-psihologicheskie tipy dosugovoj aktivnosti pozhilyh lyudej (na primere zhitelej moskovskogo regiona). [Socio-psychological types of leisure activities of the elderly (for example, residents of the Moscow region)]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psihologiya. № 1(46). Р. 89–99. (In Russ.).

Zhuravlev A. L. (1998). Vzaimodejstvie sotsial’no-psihologicheskih i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskih fenomenov v izmenyayushchemsya obshchestve. [The interaction of socio-psychological and socio-economic phenomena in a changing society]. Stscial’no-psihologicheskaya dinamika v usloviyah ekonomicheskih izmenenij. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN». P. 11–37. (In Russ.).

Zhuravlev A. L., Kitova D. A. (2019). Sotsial’no-psihologicheskie faktory ekonomicheskogo razvitiya rossijskogo obshchestva v usloviyah cifrovyh tekhnologij. [Socio-psychological factors of the economic development of Russian society in digital technology]. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psihologiya. T. 4. № 4 (16). P. 6–42. (In Russ.).

Inglehart R., Welzel S. (2005). Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press. 334 p.

Sauter M. The World’s Most Resource-Rich Countries. URL: https://247wallst.com/special-report/2012/04/18/the-worlds-most-resource-rich-countries (date of access: 23.08.2019).
Article

Received: 14.04.2020

Accepted: 30.06.2020

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Zhuravlev, A. L. and Kitova, D. A. (2020) ’Socio-Psychological Resources of the Development of Society in Digital Technology’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 8(2), pp. 24-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.2.7301.