Organizational and Methodological Aspects of Remote Research of Problems of Digitalization of Regions with Different Level of Sociocultural Modernization. Part II

  • Vladimir S. Bogdanov Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS valarf@mail.ru ORCID ID 0000-0003-0176-1007
    Elibrary Author_id 276478
How to Cite
Bogdanov V.S. 2020. Organizational and Methodological Aspects of Remote Research of Problems of Digitalization of Regions with Different Level of Sociocultural Modernization. Part II — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 131-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.1.7100

Abstract

This is the second part of the article, devoted to the study of the issues relating to the control of digitalization processes in Russian regions with different levels of sociocultural modernization. In the first part of the article, the theoretical and methodological and organizational aspects of remote study of these issues were presented. In particular, in the context of socioeconomic transformations outlined and approved by state authorities in strategic “breakthrough” plans, the necessity of conceptualizing digitalization as a process was explicated. Digitalization and the digital economy have become new markers in the power and political discourse quite recently, but the national “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” project has already been launched, which, according to its developers, should ensure the high-quality achievement of the goals of digitalization with regard to the primary elements of management (training of personnel and development of organizational and technological infrastructures). However, the role of digitalization in the modernization of regions is not fully understood. The social effects that the population may experience from the introduction of “breakthrough” design choices are not clear. Today, the population is compulsorily involved in rigorous algorithms and procedures of information technology interactions, in which the rules are initially established by technocratic subsystems, and not by the people, who would at least have the right to a wider degree of feedback from government agencies and its contractors, with well-defined guarantees for resolving their problems. In this regard, we actualize the problem of the transition from technocratic smart “regulation” involving technical methods of one-way communication to the search for ways to organize feedback based on socially-oriented management. In the framework of the industrial scientific and educational discipline of management sociology, we continue to study these issues and suggest getting acquainted with the results of an empirical study of the readiness of residents of 17 regions of the Russian Federation for digital transformations in their life and work. For clarification of the associated issues, we conducted a survey of experts. We used the data collected to determine the general preparedness of regional organizations and enterprises for digital transformation and to evaluate their inclusion in the digitalization management process. In particular, an assessment of the available resources for the implementation of “breakthrough” projects was made, and the attitude of residents of the regions toward the implementation of the national “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” project was determined. The article also touches on the prospects for the implementation of the “Smart City” project as an essential aspect of the “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” strategic project.
Keywords:
Digitalization of regions, management of digitalization, socially oriented management, digital economy, digital transformation, informatization, regional management, socio-cultural modernization, “Smart city”

Author Biography

Vladimir S. Bogdanov, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS
Candidate of Sociology, Senior Researcher

References

5 samykh umnykh gorodov mira i smart-tekhnologii, kotorye oni ispolzuyut. (2020). [The 5 smartest cities in the world and the smart technologies they use]. Soobshhestvo robotexnikov. URL: https:// robo-hunter.com/news/5-samih-umnih-gorodov-mira-i-smart-tehnologii-kotorie-oni-ispolzuyt11521 (data obrashheniya: 19.01.2020). (In Russ.).



Atlas modernizatsii Rossii i ee regionov: sotsioekonomicheskie i sotsiokul’turnye tendentsii i problemy. (2016). [Atlas of modernization of Russia and its regions: socio-economic and socio-cultural trends and problems]. Ed. by. N. I. Lapin. M.: Ves’ Mir publ., 360 p. (In Russ.).



Tsifrovizatsiya dolzhna stat’ dlya Rossii ne opasnostyu, a vozmozhnostyu. (2018). [Digitalization should not be a danger for Russia, but an opportunity]. Business Excellence. № 4. P. 44–50. (In Russ.).



Kravchenko S. A. (2019). Mnogolikost’ metamorfoz: o novatsiyax dvukh kanadskikh sotsiologov. [The many faces of metamorphoses: about innovations of two canadian sociologists]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. №2. P. 26–35. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003999 (In Russ.).



Tikhonov A. V. (2017). Reformirovanie raboty organov vlasti i upravleniya kak neotlozhnaya natsional’naya problema. [Reforming the work of the authorities and administration as an urgent national problem]. Sociology and management. Nauchnyj rezultat. № 4. P. 70–106. DOI: 10.18413/2408-93382017-3-4-70-106 (In Russ.).



Ukaz Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federatsii «O Strategii nauchno-texnologicheskogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federatsii». (2016). [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation”] Prezident Rossii. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449 (data obrashheniya: 10.08.2019). (In Russ.).



Tapscott D. (1994). The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril In The Age of Networked Intelligence. NY: McGraw-Hill. 368 p.



Negroponte N. (1995). Being Digital. NY: Knopf. 256 p.
Article

Received: 24.09.2019

Accepted: 01.04.2020

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Bogdanov, V. S. (2020) ’Organizational and Methodological Aspects of Remote Research of Problems of Digitalization of Regions with Different Level of Sociocultural Modernization. Part II’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 8(1), pp. 131-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2020.8.1.7100.