Civic Engagement as an Externality of Social Capital

  • Tatiana A. Guzhavina Vologda Scientific Center of RAS tanja_gta@mail.ru
Acknowledgments
The article was prepared with the financial support of RFBR. Grant № 19-011-0724/19 «Barriers to civic participation and mechanisms to overcome them at the regional level»
How to Cite
Guzhavina T.A. 2019. Civic Engagement as an Externality of Social Capital — Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 37-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2019.7.1.6268

Abstract

The concept of social capital that has become popular in the last decades has significant heuristic potential. It is developed through the broadening of the object of research. Today, the study of the externalities of social capital remains an under-investigated area. The use of social capital has a wide range of external effects. Most often, attention is paid to their occurrence in the economy. However, they are present in all spheres of social life and are significant there, too. Thus, in the sphere of political engagement, social effects may include various forms of civic engagement, which facilitate the functioning of civil society, and, in particular, the implementation of its function as a mechanism of feedback between the society and state. This article aims to demonstrate using empirical material the dependence of respondents’ civic engagement on their social capital. The empirical research base is represented by the results of public opinion polls of the population of Vologda Region, conducted in June 2016 by specialists of the Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Federal Publicly Funded Institution of Science. During data analysis carried out on the basis of an indicator model of social capital measurement developed in the course of the Regional Social Capital in Crisis Conditions project, groups of social capital bearers different in accumulation level were identified. Data were analyzed with the use of the SPSS package. The research discovered that the civic activity demonstrated by respondents depends on their belonging to a group with accumulated social capital. Persons with social capital of higher level were to a much greater extent involved in various forms of civic engagement.
Keywords:
social capital, external effects, civic participation, indicator model

Author Biography

Tatiana A. Guzhavina, Vologda Scientific Center of RAS
Candidate of Philosophy Science, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

References

Antonenko I. V. Integrativny’j potentsial doveriya: metaotnosheniya i funktsii. [Integrative potential of trust: meta-relationship and functions]. Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvenny’j universitet upravleniya). 2012. № 1. P. 104–108. (In Russ.).



Afanas’ev D. V. K issledovaniyu roli social’nogo kapitala regionov v usloviyax social’noe’konomicheskogo krizisa. [To study the role of social capital of regions in the conditions of socioeconomic crisis]. Economicheskije I sotsial’nyje peremeny: facty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2015. № 4(40). P. 88–108. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15838/esc/215.4.40.6.



Afanas’ev D. V., Guzhavina T. A., Mekhova A. A. Sotsial’ny’j kapital v regione: k voprosu izmereniya i postroeniya indikatornoj modeli. [Social capital in the region: on the measurement and construction of the indicator model]. E’konomicheskie i sotcial’ny’e peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2016. № 6(48). P. 110–125. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15838/esc/215.4.40.6.



Belyaeva L. A. Regional’nii sotsial’nii kapital I mnozhestvennaya modernizatsia v Rossii. К postanovke problemy. [Regional social capital and multiple modernization in Russia. To problem statement]. E’konomicheskie i sotcial’ny’e peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2014. № 1 (31). P. 108–115. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15838/esc/2014.1.31.10



Blonin V. A. Ivashinenko N. N., Strelkov D. G. Problemy’ i perspektivy’ razvitiya grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Nizhegorodskoj oblasti: integraciya NKO. [Problems and prospects of civil society development in Nizhny Novgorod region: NGO integration]. Vestnik nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2008. № 2. P. 250–258. (In Russ.).



Fukuyama F. Doverie: sotsial’ny’e dobrodeteli i put’ k protsvetaniyu. [Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity]. M.: AST; Ermak publ., 2004.734 p. (In Russ.).



Guzhavina T. A Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo: voprosy’ samoorganizacii na regional’nom urovne. [Regional civil society: conditions and factors of existence]. Vestnik Pomorskogo universiteta. 2010. № 3. P. 42–45. (In Russ.).



Guzhavina T. A. Regional’noe grazhdanskoe obshhestvo: usloviya i faktory’ sushhestvovaniya. [Regional civil society: conditions and factors of existence]. Problemy’ razvitiya territorii. 2015. № 3 (77). URL: http://pdt.vscc.ac.ru/article/1259 (In Russ.).



Guzhavina T. A., Vorob’eva I. N. Primenenie faktornogo analiza pri izmerenii social’nogo kapitala. [The use of factor analysis in the measurement of social capital]. [E’lektronny’j resurs]. Sotsial’noe prostranstvo. 2017. № 4. URL: http://sa.vscc.ac.ru/article/2377 (In Russ.).



Kirdina S. G. «Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo»: ukhod ot ideologemy. [Civil society: moving away from the ideologeme]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 2. P. 63–73. (In Russ.).



Kozy’reva P. M. Mezhlichnostnoe doverie v kontekste formirovaniya social’nogo kapitala. [Interpersonal trust in the context of social capital formation]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 1. P. 43–54. (In Russ.).



Koulman Dzh. Kapital sotsial’ny’j i chelovecheskij. [Social and human capital]. Obshhestvenny’e nauki i sovremennost’. 2001. № 3. P. 122–139. (In Russ.).



Kuchenkova A. V. Mezhlichnostnoe doverie v rossiyskom obschestve. [Interpersonal trust in Russian society]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. № 1. P. 26–36. (In Russ.).



Mersiyanova I. V. Dobrovol’nye ob’edineniya grazhdan v mestnom samoupravlenii: problemy institutsionalizatsii. [Voluntary associations of citizens in local self-government: problems of institutionalization]. M.: Academia publ., 2004. 180 p. (In Russ.).



Mersiyanova I. V. Sotsial’naya baza rossiyskogo grazhdanskogo obschestva. [Social base of Russian civil society] Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2009. № 4. P. 35–45. (In Russ.).



Mersiyanova I. V., Korneeva I. E. Vovlechennost’ naseleniya v neformal’nye praktiki grazhdanskogo obschestva i deyatel’nost’ NKO: regional’noe izmerenie. [Involvement of the population in informal practices of civil society and activities of NGOs: regional dimension]. M.: NIU VSHE publ., 2011. 196 p. (In Russ.).



Mersiyanova I. V., Yakobson L. I. Obschestvennaya aktivnost’ naseleniya i vospriyatie grazhdanami usloviy razvitiya grazhdanskogo obschestva. [Public activity of the population and citizens ‘ perception of the conditions of civil society development]. Predisl. Ya. I. Kuz’minova. M.: Izd. dom GU VSHE publ., 2007. 220 p. (In Russ.).



Polischuk L. Menyashev R. E’konomicheskoe znachenie social’nogo kapitala. [Economic importance of social capital]. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2011. № 12. P. 46–65. (In Russ.).



Radaev V. V. Ponyatie kapitala, formy kapitalov i ih konvertaciya. [The concept of capital, forms of capital and their conversion]. Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya. Elektronnyj zhurnal. 2002. Sentyabr’. T. 3. № 4. P. 20–32. (In Russ.).



Stepanenko V. Sotsial’ny’j kapital v sotsiologicheskoj perspektive: teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty’ issledovaniya. [Social capital in sociological perspective: theoretical and methodological aspects of the research]. Sotsiologiya: teoriya, metody, marketing. 2004. № 2. P. 24–41. (In Russ.).



Tokvil’ A. de. Demokratija v Amerike. [Democracy in America]. M.: Progress publ., 1992. 554 p. (In Russ.). Shamatonova G. L. Stanovlenie grazhdanskogo obshhestva v sovremennoj Rossii: regional’ny’e osobennosti i problemy’ razvitiya. [Formation of civil society in modern Russia: regional features and problems of development]. Vestnik social’no-politicheskix nauk. 2013. № 12. p. 156–161. (In Russ.).



Yanitskij O. N. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo i akademicheskoe soobschestvo. [Civil society and the academic community]. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Ofitsial’nyj sajt IC RAN. 2010. URL: http://www.isras.ru/ publ.html?id=1817 (data obrascheniya: 15.04.2018). (In Russ.).



Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Ed. by J. G. Richardson. N.Y.: Greenwood Press, 1986. P. 241–258.



Coleman J. The Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard UP, 1993. 993 p.



Dasgupta P. Social capital: a multifaceted perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2000.



Fedderke J. W. Economic Growth and Social Capital. Theory and Society. 1999. № 28. Р. 709–745.



Knack S., Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997. № 112 (4). P. 1251–1288.



Ostrom E. Social capital: fad or a fundamental concept? Social capital, a multifaceted perspective. Ed. by P. Dasgupta, I. Serageldin. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2000.



Putnam R. Making democracy work: civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.



Putnam R. D. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.



Uslaner E. M. The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press, 2002. 312 p.



Zaleski P. Global non-governmental administrative system: geosociology of the third sector. Civil Society in the Making. IFiS Publishers, Warszawa 2006. P. 114–143.



Zielenbach S. The art of revitalization: improving conditions in distressed inner-city neighborhoods. New York: Garland, 2000. 200 р.



Woolcock ., Narayan D. Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory Research and Policy. IBRD, Research Observer. 2000. № 15 (2). P. 225–251.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

Harvard
Guzhavina, T. A. (2019) ’Civic Engagement as an Externality of Social Capital’, Sociologicheskaja nauka i social’naja praktika, 7(1), pp. 37-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2019.7.1.6268.