Gender differences in financial behavior of population

Research Article
  • Aziza V. Yarasheva Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation baktriana@rambler.ru ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6041-7700
    Elibrary Author_id 519466
    ResearchID A-9976–2017
  • Natalia V. Alikperova Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation natalie_danilina@mail.ru ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-078X
    Elibrary Author_id 754213
    ResearchID S-1899–2018
Acknowledgments
The study was carried out within the framework of research under the State assignment «Analysis of the activities of the population of Russian regions in the sphere of financial behavior, dissemination of information technologies, natural and migration movement» (No. 0165–2018–0005).
How to Cite
Yarasheva A.V., Alikperova N.V. Gender differences in financial behavior of population. Population. 2020. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 51-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.2.5

Abstract

The article analyzes various studies in the field of population behavior in the financial market. Since psychological factors related to mentality, temperament, and risk-taking play an important role in implementing financial strategies, along with rational motives, women and men may behave differently. An attempt is made to answer the question: whether there are significant gender differences in financial behavior models, and whether this aspect requires a close attention of scientists who study trends and features of forming strategies of Russians when making economic decisions. A review of Russian and foreign studies aimed at investigation of gender characteristics of investment behavior and financial literacy is performed. Traditionally, in most families, men are responsible for the financial situation, they are more concerned with providing for their family, earning and multiplying money. Women, as a rule, are more concerned with the «inner» side of family life — so that everyone is fed, dressed, shod, and provided with everything necessary. Therefore, if both of them have decided to invest, the emphasis in the well-known formula «save and multiply» is made by men on the second word, and by women — on the first. As a result, women are significantly less likely to take risks and more likely to make profitable transactions. Men are more prone to take risks, for them it is not so much the result of investment that is important, as the excitement, and work in the financial markets is somewhat akin to hunting. Probably there are some primitive triggers at the level of the subconscious that are blocked by the norms of morality and etiquette in society. For women, stability is much more important, and the desire to maintain a sense of security prevails rather than a thirst for risk. The study revealed poor elaboration of this topic, lack of Russian research on gender-specific financial behavior due to the underdevelopment of the Russian financial market, as well as the lack of sufficient supply of financial instruments for further accumulation of experience in implementing their strategies by representatives of both genders.
Keywords:
financial behavior, investment strategies, gender aspect, financial literacy

Author Biographies

Aziza V. Yarasheva, Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Econ.), Professor, Head of laboratory
Natalia V. Alikperova, Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Institute of Socio-Economic Studies of Population, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology RAS; Associate Professor, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

References

1. Alikperova N. V., Yarasheva A. V., Vinogradova K. V. Motivatsiya trudovogo povedeniya molodezhi kak vozmozhnosti dlya realizatsii finansovykh strategiy [Motivating young people’s labor behavior as an opportunity for implementing financial strategies]. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast]. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 226–240. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.1.61.14. (in Russ.)

2. Alexandrova O. A., Yarasheva A. V. Transformatsiya investitsionno-sberegatel’nogo povedeniya vysokodokhodnykh grupp naseleniya v period krizisa [Transformation of investment and savings behavior of high-income groups of the population during the crisis]. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz [Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast]. 2016. Vol. 12. No. 1(43). P. 122–137. DOI: 10.15838/esc/2016.1.43.8 (in Russ.)

3. Alikperova N. V., Vinogradova K. V. Finansovo gramotnoye povedeniye rossiyan: faktory formirovaniya [Financially literate behavior of Russians: factors of formation]. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living Standard of the Population in the Regions of Russia]. 2019. No. 4(214). P. 54–69. DOI: 10.24411/1999–9836–2019–10082 (in Russ.)

4. Alikperova N. V. Finansovaya gramotnost’ rossiyan v sovremennykh realiyakh [Financial literacy of Russians in modern realities]. Sbornik trudov V Mezhdunarodnogo foruma finansovogo universiteta «Kak popast’ v pyaterku» [Proceedings of the V International Forum of the Financial University How to Get into the Top Five]. Moscow. November 17–29, 2018. Ed. A. G. Tyurikov. Moscow. Finansovyy universitet [Financial University]. 2018. P. 4–8. (in Russ.)

5. Alikperova N. V. Finansovyye strategii rossiyan: riski i bar’yery [Financial strategies of Russians: risks and barriers]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2019. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 120–132. DOI: 10.24411/1561– 7785–2019–00020 (in Russ.)

6. Medvedeva E. I., Yarasheva A. V., Toreyev V. B., Kroshilin S. V. Finansovyye strategii zhiteley rossiyskikh gorodov [Financial strategies of residents of Russian cities]. Natsional’nyye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ [National Interests: Priorities and Security]. 2016. Vol. 12. No. 3(336). P. 4–14. (in Russ.)

7. Yarasheva A. V. Dinamika kreditnoy zadolzhennosti rossiyan po makroregionam [Dynamics of credit debt of Russians by macroregions]. Dokhody, raskhody i sberezheniya naseleniya Rossii: tendentsii i perspektivy [Incomes, Expenditures and Savings of the Population of Russia: Trends and Prospects]. Proceedings of the IV International scientific and practical conference. Eds. A. V. Yarasheva, O. A. Alexandrova, N. V. Alikperova. Moscow. ISEPN RAN. [ISESP RAS]. 2019. P. 165–167. (in Russ.)

8. Yarasheva A. V., Burdastova Yu. V., Dokholyan A. S. Osobennosti potrebitel’skogo povedeniya rossiyan v razreze makroregionov i sotsial’no-dokhodnykh grupp [Features of consumer behavior of Russians in the context of macroregions and socio-income groups]. Regional’nyye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki [Regional Problems of Economic Transformation]. 2014. No. 7(45). P. 27–34. (in Russ.)

9. Medynskaya E. K. Issledovaniye finansovoy aktivnosti naseleniya na rynke investitsionnykh produktov [Investigation of the financial activity of population in the market of investment products]. Dokhody, raskhody i sberezheniya naseleniya Rossii: tendentsii i perspektivy [Incomes, Expenditures and Savings of the Population of Russia: Trends and Prospects]. Proceedings of the IV International scientific and practical conference. Eds. A. V. Yarasheva, O. A. Alexandrova, N. V. Alikperova. Moscow. ISEPN RAN [ISESP RAS]. 2019. P. 71–75. (in Russ.)

10. Litvin V. V. Tipologiya motivatsii sberegatel’nogo povedeniya naseleniya [Typology of motivation for saving behavior of the population]. Ekonomicheskiye i gumanitarnyye nauki [Economic and Humanitarian Sciences]. 2015. No. 12(287). P. 19–25. (in Russ.)

11. Schneiderman I. M., Yarasheva A. V. Kreditnoye povedeniye naseleniya: tendentsii i riski [Population borrowing behavior: Trends and risks]. Voprosy statistiki. [Statistical Studies]. 2019. Vol. 26. No. 3. P. 15–22. DOI: 10.34023/2313–6383–2019–26–3–15–22 (in Russ.)

12. Zalessky P. K. Samootsenka material’nogo polozheniya i pokupatel’skoye povedeniye rossiyan v usloviyakh krizisa i ekonomicheskikh sanktsiy (2015–2018 gg.) [Self-assessment of the material situation and purchasing behavior of Russians under the conditions of crisis and economic sanctions (2015–2018)]. Dokhody, raskhody i sberezheniya naseleniya Rossii: tendentsii i perspektivy [Incomes, Expenditures and Savings of the Population of Russia: Trends and Prospects]. Proceedings of the IV International scientific and practical conference. Eds. A. V. Yarasheva, O. A. Alexandrova, N. V. Alikperova. Moscow. ISEPN RAN [ISESP RAS]. 2019. P. 46–48. (in Russ.)

13. Trofimova K. A. Otnosheniye rossiyskogo naseleniya k strakhovaniyu [Attitude of the Russian population to insurance]. Narodonaselenie [Population]. 2017. No. 1(75). P. 92–102. (in Russ.)

14. Chernukhina T. N. Motivy i faktory sberegatel’nogo povedeniya naseleniya v period finansovogo krizisa [Motives and factors of the saving behavior of population during the financial crisis]. Teoriya i praktika sovremennoy nauki [Theory and Practice of Modern Science]. 2016. No. 6–2(12). P. 342–351. (in Russ.)

15. Burdastova Yu. V. Sotsial’no-demograficheskiy analiz finansovogo povedeniya naseleniya [Socio- demographic analysis of the financial behavior of population]. Upravleniye ekonomicheskimi sistemami [Management of Economic Systems]. Electronic scientific journal. 2013. No. 3(51). P. 9. (in Russ.)

16. Romanova E. N. Modelirovaniye ekonomicheskogo povedeniya domokhozyaystv na finansovom rynke: gendernyy aspekt [Modeling economic behavior of households in the financial market: gender aspect]. Sovremennyye tekhnologii upravleniya [Modern Management Technologies] — 2014. Proceedings of the international scientific conference. 2014. P. 408–419. (in Russ.)

17. Barber B. M., Odean T. (eds.). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2001. No. 1. P. 261–292.

18. Croson R., Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 47. No. 2. June 2009. P. 448–74.

19. Van Anh Hoang. Gender-Specific Differences in the Financial Decision-Making Behavior. Munich. GRIN Verlag. 2015. 77 p. ISBN978–3–668–19123–5

20. Mittal M., Vyas R. K. A study of psychological reasons for gender differences in preferences for risk and investment decision making. IUP Journal of Behavioral Finance. 2011. No. 8(3). P. 45.

21. Malkina M. Yu., Rogachev D. Yu. Vzaimosvyaz’ finansovoy gramotnosti v sfere tsifrovykh tekhnologiy i lichnostnykh kharakteristik rossiyskikh studentov: gendernyy aspekt [Interrelation of financial literacy in the sphere of digital technologies and personal characteristics of Russian students: gender aspect]. Zhenshchina v rossiyskom obshchestve [Woman in Russian Society]. 2018. No. 3(88). P. 104–115. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2018.3.10 (in Russ.)

22. Driva A., Lührmann M., Winter J. Gender differences and stereotypes in financial literacy: Off to an early start. Economics Letters. 2016 (September). Vol. 146. P. 143–146.

23. Bannier C. E., Neubert M. Gender differences in financial risk taking: The role of financial literacy and risk tolerance. Economics Letters. 2016 (August). Vol. 145. P. 130–135.

24. Yu K.-M., Wu А. М., Chan W.-S., Chou K.-L. Gender differences in financial literacy among Hong Kong workers. Educational Gerontology. 2015. 3 April. Vol. 41. Iss. 4. P. 315–326.

25. Harrison N., Agnew S. Financial literacy and student attitudes to debt: A cross national study examining the influence of gender on personal finance concepts. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2015 (July). Vol. 25. P. 122–129.

26. Dulina N. V., Moiseeva D. V., Nebykov I. A. Finansovaya gramotnost’ naseleniya: gendernyy aspekt (na materialakh sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya «Volgogradskiy omnibus») [Financial literacy of population: gender aspect (based on the data from the “Volgograd OMNIBUS” sociological study)]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial’nyye tekhnologii [Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 7: Philosophy. Sociology and Social Technologies]. 2017. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 86–99. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu7.2017.1. 10 (in Russ.)
Article

Received: 22.03.2020

Accepted: 08.06.2020

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Yarasheva, A. V., & Alikperova, N. V. (2020). Gender differences in financial behavior of population. Population, 23(2), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2020.23.2.5
Section
QUALITY, STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS OF POPULATION LIFE